首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Psychological Science >Are Different Forms of Repetitive Negative Thinking Associated With Interpretation Bias in Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Depression?
【24h】

Are Different Forms of Repetitive Negative Thinking Associated With Interpretation Bias in Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Depression?

机译:是与广泛性焦虑症和抑郁症的解释偏倚相关的不同形式的重复性负面思考吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Worry and rumination, two forms of repetitive negative thinking (RNT), are prevalent in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and depression. Cognitive processing biases, especially the tendency to draw negative conclusions from ambiguous information (interpretation bias), may maintain worry and rumination. Yet the relationship between interpretation bias and both forms of RNT has not been explored in clinical versus nonclinical samples. In this cross-sectional study, participants with GAD (n = 72), depression (n = 79), or neither disorder (n = 71) completed two tasks assessing interpretation bias, measures of worry and rumination, and reported negative thought intrusions during a behavioral task. Interpretation bias was associated with higher levels of worry, rumination, and negative thought intrusions. Both clinical groups generated significantly more negative interpretations than healthy comparison participants. These findings link interpretation bias to worry and rumination and establish the need for research investigating the causal role of interpretation bias in maintaining RNT.
机译:担心和谣言,两种形式的重复性负面思维(RNT),在广泛性焦虑症(GAD)和抑郁症中普遍存在。认知处理偏见,尤其是从模糊信息(解释偏见)中汲取负面结论的趋势,可能保持忧虑和谣言。然而,在临床与非临床样本中尚未探讨解释偏见与两种形式的RNT之间的关系。在这个横断面研究中,有Gad(n = 72)的参与者,抑郁症(n = 79),或既不是紊乱(n = 71)完成评估解释偏见,忧心措施和谣言的两项任务,并报告了期间的负面思想入侵行为任务。解释偏见与更高水平的忧虑,谣言和消极思想入侵有关。两种临床组都产生了比健康的比较参与者更明显的负解释。这些调查结果链接解释偏见,以担心和谣言,并确定需要研究解释偏倚在维持RNT方面的因果作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号