首页> 外文期刊>Clinical neurophysiology >P318 Heart rate variability is not able to detect cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction in patients with clinically isolated syndrome
【24h】

P318 Heart rate variability is not able to detect cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction in patients with clinically isolated syndrome

机译:P318心率变异性无法检测临床综合征患者心血管自主功能障碍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives To determine differences in heart rate variability (HRV) in a large cohort of patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) compared to healthy controls (HC). Methods Two hundred CIS patients (134 females, mean age 32.67 ± 9.17 years) and 58 HC (38 females, mean age 30.93 ± 9401 years) were enrolled. In all participants ECG was recorded during 10 min in both supine and 70° tilt-up position. HRVanalysis was performed by Kubios HRV 2.2. Following HRV parameters were compared between groups: total power of low (LF) and high frequency domain components (HF), normalized HF (HFnu), low-to-high frequency ratio (LF/HF), standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN). Results No differences were found between groups in LF (733.41 ± 820.45 vs 617.69 ± 516.17, p = 0.592), HF (829.54 ± 1373.34 vs 890.33 ± 1055.49, p = 0.929), HFnu (45.93 ± 18.80 vs 48.43 ± 20.93, p = 0.397), LH/HF (1.66 ± 1.65 vs 1.62 ± 1.51, p = 0.616) and SDNN (37.66 ± 19.94 vs. 37.61 ± 18.35, p = 0.991) in the supine position. No differences were found between groups in LF (638.44 ± 786.26 vs 648.86 ± 537.22, p = 0.321), HF (184.74 ± 291.09 vs 179.07 ± 208.27, p = 0.556), HFnu (22.67 ± 14.67 vs 23.08 ± 16.81, p = 0.895), LH/HF (5.65 ± 4.71 vs 5.84 ± 4.85, p = 0.669) and SDNN (27.46 ± 13.03 vs 28.13 ± 10.40, p = 0.719) in the tilt-up position. Discussion Recent studies have shown that autonomic dysfunction measured with Composite autonomic scoring scale (CASS) is present in half of CIS patients. The results of the present study suggest that CASS is superior compared to HRV analysis in the detection of autonomic dysfunction in CIS. Conclusion No differences were observed in HRV analysis between CIS patients and healthy controls during supine and tilt-up position. Significance HRV analysis is normal in patients with clinically isolated syndrome. ]]>
机译:与健康对照(HC)相比,目的是在临床上分离综合征(CIS)的大型患者中的心率变异性(HRV)差异。方法二百个顺式患者(134名女性,平均32.67±9.17岁)和58 HC(女性,平均年龄为30.93±9401岁)。在所有参与者中,ECG在仰卧和70°倾斜位置时10分钟记录。 Hrvanalysis通过Kubios HRV 2.2进行。在基团之间进行了HRV参数:低(LF)和高频域组分(HF)的总功率,归一化HF(HFNU),低至高频比(LF / HF),正常到的标准偏差正常间隔(SDNN)。结果在LF中的组之间没有发现差异(733.41±820.45 Vs 617.69±516.17,p = 0.592),HF(829.54±1373.34 Vs 890.33±1055.49,p = 0.929),HFNU(45.93±18.80 Vs 48.43±20.93,P = 0.397),LH / HF(1.66±1.65 Vs 1.62±1.51,P = 0.616)和SDNN(37.66±19.94与37.61±18.35,P = 0.991),处于仰卧位置。在LF中的组之间没有发现差异(638.44±786.26 Vs 648.86±537.22,p = 0.321),HF(184.74±291.09 Vs 179.07±208.27,P = 0.556),HFNU(22.67±14.67 Vs 23.08±16.81,P = 0.895 ),LH / HF(5.65±4.71 Vs 5.84±4.85,p = 0.669)和SDNN(27.46±13.03与倾斜位置的28.13±10.40,P = 0.719)。讨论最近的研究表明,随着复合自主评分量表(CASS)测量的自主功能障碍存在于CIS患者的一半。本研究的结果表明,与检测到顺式自主功能障碍的HRV分析相比,CASS优越。结论在仰卧和倾斜位置在CIS患者和健康对照之间的HRV分析中没有观察到差异。临床上综合征患者的显着性HRV分析是正常的。 ]]>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号