首页> 外文期刊>Clinical EEG and neuroscience: official journal of the EEG and Clinical Neuroscience Society (ENCS) >Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Right Frontal Inferior Cortex Decreases Neural Activity Needed to Achieve Inhibition: A Double-Blind ERP Study in a Male Population
【24h】

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Right Frontal Inferior Cortex Decreases Neural Activity Needed to Achieve Inhibition: A Double-Blind ERP Study in a Male Population

机译:右前期皮质的经颅直流刺激降低了实现抑制所需的神经活动:男性人群中的双盲ERP研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Inhibitory control refers to the ability to inhibit an action once it has been initiated. Impaired inhibitory control plays a key role in triggering relapse in some pathological states, such as addictions. Therefore, a major challenge of current research is to establish new methods to strengthen inhibitory control in these "high-risk" populations. In this attempt, the right inferior frontal cortex (rIFC), a neural correlate crucial for inhibitory control, was modulated using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Healthy participants (n = 31) were presented with a "Go/No-go" task, a well-known paradigm to measure inhibitory control. During this task, an event-related potential (ERP) recording (T1; 32 channels) was performed. One subgroup (n = 15) was randomly assigned to a condition with tDCS (anodal electrode was placed on the rIFC and the cathodal on the neck); and the other group (n = 16) to a condition with sham (placebo) tDCS. After one 20-minute neuromodulation session, all participants were confronted again with the same ERP Go/ No-go task (T2). To ensure that potential tDCS effects were specific to inhibition, ERPs to a face-detection task were also recorded at T1 and T2 in both subgroups. The rate of commission errors on the Go/ No-go task was similar between T1 and T2 in both neuromodulation groups. However, the amplitude of the P3d component, indexing the inhibition function per se, was reduced at T2 as compared with T1. This effect was specific for participants in the tDCS (and not sham) condition for correctly inhibited trials. No difference in the P3 component was observable between both subgroups at T1 and T2 for the face detection task. Overall, the present data indicate that boosting the rIFC specifically enhances inhibitory skills by decreasing the neural activity needed to correctly inhibit a response.
机译:抑制对照是指一旦启动抑制动作的能力。受损的抑制控制在一些病态状态下触发复发时起着关键作用,例如上瘾。因此,目前研究的一项重大挑战是建立新的方法,以加强这些“高风险”种群中的抑制控制。在这种尝试中,使用经颅直流刺激(TDC)调节右下额叶(RIFC),抑制控制的神经相关性至关重要。健康的参与者(n = 31)以“GO / NO-GO-GO”任务,一个众所周知的范式来呈现,以测量抑制控制。在此任务期间,执行事件相关的电位(ERP)录制(T1; 32个通道)。将一个亚组(n = 15)随机分配给具有TDC的条件(将阳极电极放在RIFC上,阴极在颈部上);和其他组(n = 16)到具有假(安慰剂)TDC的条件。在20分钟的神经调节会议后,所有参与者都会再次面对相同的ERP GO / NO-GO-TAIM(T2)。为了确保潜在的TDCS效应特异于抑制,在两个亚组中的T1和T2也被记录到面部检测任务的ERP。 Go / No-Go Task的佣金误差率在神经调节组中的T1和T2之间类似。然而,与T1相比,P3D组分索引抑制函数本身的P3D组分的幅度降低。这种效果对于TDCS(而不是假)条件的参与者特异性,用于正确抑制试验。对于面部检测任务,在T1和T2的两个子组之间没有观察到P3组分的差异。总的来说,本数据表明,通过降低正确抑制反应所需的神经活动,提高RIFC专门提高抑制技能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号