首页> 外文期刊>Acta Haematologica >Utility of the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index and the International Prognostic Index in assessing prognosis and predicting first-line treatment efficacy in follicular lymphoma patients.
【24h】

Utility of the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index and the International Prognostic Index in assessing prognosis and predicting first-line treatment efficacy in follicular lymphoma patients.

机译:滤泡性淋巴瘤国际预后指数和国际预后指数在评估滤泡性淋巴瘤患者的预后和预测一线治疗功效中的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) allows physicians to stratify patients into groups with distinct prognoses, however its ability to predict the treatment efficacy has not been fully investigated. The aim of this study was to validate on this respect the FLIPI system in an independent cohort and compare it with the International Prognostic Index (IPI) used for aggressive lymphomas. METHODS: Records from patients referred to our unit with a diagnosis of follicular lymphoma (FL) were retrospectively reviewed. Data required for FLIPI and IPI scores were collected along with data regarding first-line chemotherapy and time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 162 patients screened, 130 were assessable for both (FLIPI and IPI) scores. OS for low-risk (LR) patients identified either with IPI or FLIPI was significantly longer compared to intermediate-risk (IR) and high-risk (HR) groups, with FLIPI allowing a more even patient distribution among the risk groups. For patients receiving first-line chemotherapy within 6 months of diagnosis, a low FLIPI score was associated with a longer TTF (3-year TTF rates: 68.0, 33.7 and 31.0% for FLIPI-defined LR, IR and HR patients, respectively, p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Our data support the prognostic value of both IPI and FLIPI, with FLIPI demonstrating a more convenient patient distribution among risk classes. A low FLIPI score was also associated with a longer TTF. This might partially contribute to a more favourable prognosis.
机译:背景:滤泡性淋巴瘤国际预后指数(FLIPI)允许医生将患者分为具有不同预后的人群,但是其预测治疗效果的能力尚未得到充分研究。这项研究的目的是在一个独立的队列中验证FLIPI系统,并将其与用于侵袭性淋巴瘤的国际预后指数(IPI)进行比较。方法:回顾性分析转诊至本单位的诊断为滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)的患者的记录。收集FLIPI和IPI分数所需的数据,以及有关一线化疗以及治疗失败时间(TTF)和总体生存期(OS)的数据。结果:在筛查的162例患者中,有130例可同时评估FLIPI和IPI评分。与中危(IR)和高危(HR)组相比,使用IPI或FLIPI识别的低危(LR)患者的OS明显更长,FLIPI可以使患者在这些风险组之间更均匀地分布。对于在诊断后6个月内接受一线化疗的患者,较低的FLIPI评分与较长的TTF相关(对于FLIPI定义的LR,IR和HR患者,3年TTF率分别为68.0%,33.7%和31.0%,p = 0.026)。结论:我们的数据支持IPI和FLIPI的预后价值,FLIPI证明了在风险类别之间更方便的患者分布。低FLIPI分数也与较长的TTF相关。这可能部分有助于更好的预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号