首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes >Simulation-Based Mastery Learning Improves Patient and Caregiver Ventricular Assist Device Self-Care Skills: A Randomized Pilot Trial
【24h】

Simulation-Based Mastery Learning Improves Patient and Caregiver Ventricular Assist Device Self-Care Skills: A Randomized Pilot Trial

机译:基于仿真的掌握学习改善了患者和护理心室辅助设备的自我保健技能:随机试验试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: No recognized standards exist for teaching patients and their caregivers ventricular assist device (VAD) self-care skills. We compared the effectiveness of a VAD simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) self-care training curriculum with usual VAD self-care training. METHODS AND RESULTS: VAD patients and their caregivers were randomized to SBML or usual training during their implant hospitalization. The SBML group completed a pretest on 3 VAD self-care skills (controller, power source, and dressing change), then viewed videos and participated in deliberate practice on a simulator. SBML participants took a posttest and were required to meet or exceed a minimum passing standard for each of the skills. The usual training group completed the existing institutional VAD self-care teaching protocol. Before hospital discharge, the SBML and usual training groups took the same 3 VAD self-care skills tests. We compared demographic and clinical information, self-confidence, total participant training time, and skills performance between groups. Forty participants completed the study in each group. There were no differences in demographic and clinical information, self-confidence, or training time between groups. More participants in the SBML group met the minimum passing standard compared with the usual training group for controller (37/40 [93%] versus 25/40 [63%]; P=0.001), power source (36/40 [90%] versus 9/40 [23%]; P<0.001), and dressing change skills (19/20 [95%] versus 0/20; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SBML provided superior VAD self-care skills learning outcomes compared with usual training. This study has important implications for patients due to the morbidity and mortality associated with improper VAD self-care.
机译:背景:教学患者及其护理人员的心室辅助设备(VAD)自我保健技能没有公认的标准。我们将VAD模拟的掌握学习(SBML)自我护理培训课程的有效性与通常的VAD自我保健培训进行了比较。方法和结果:VAD患者及其护理人员在植入住院期间随机转移到SBML或通常的培训。 SBML集团在3 VAD自我护理技能(控制器,电源和敷料变化)上完成了预先测试,然后观看视频并参与模拟器的故意练习。 SBML参与者采用了一个后视,需要满足或超过每个技能的最低限度。通常的培训集团完成了现行机构VAD自我保健教学议定书。在医院放电之前,SBML和通常的培训团体采取了相同的3个VAD自我护理技能测试。我们比较了人口统计和临床信息,自信,总参与者培训时间和小组之间的技能绩效。 40名参与者完成了每组的研究。人口统计和临床信息,自信或培训时间没有差异。 SBML集团的更多参与者与控制器通常的培训组相比符合最低的传递标准(37/40 [93%]与25/40 [63%]; P = 0.001),电源(36/40 [90%] [9/40]与9/40 [23%]; p <0.001),加剧改变技能(19/20 [95%]与0/20; p <0.001)。结论:与通常的培训相比,SBML提供了优越的VAD自我护理技能学习结果。由于与不正当的VAD自我保健相关的发病率和死亡率,本研究对患者对患者具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号