...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes >Video-Only Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Education for High-Risk Families Before Hospital Discharge: A Multicenter Pragmatic Trial
【24h】

Video-Only Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Education for High-Risk Families Before Hospital Discharge: A Multicenter Pragmatic Trial

机译:医院出院前高风险家庭的视频纯粹的心肺教育:多中心务实试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background—CPR training rates in the US are low, highlighting the need to develop CPR educational approaches that are simpler, with broader dissemination potential. The minimum training required to ensure long-term skill retention remains poorly characterized. We compared CPR skill retention among laypersons randomized to training with video-only (VO; no manikin) to those trained with a video serf-instruction kit (VSI; with manikin). We hypothesized that VO training would be non-inferior to the VSI approach with respect to chest compression (CC) rate. Methods and Results—We performed a prospective cluster randomized trial of CPR education for family members of high-risk cardiac patients on hospital cardiac units, using a multicenter pragmatic design. Eight hospitals were randomized to offer either VO or VSI training before discharge using volunteer trainers. CPR skills were assessed six months post-training. Mean CC rate among those trained with VO compared to VSI was assessed with a non-inferiority margin set at 8 CC per min (cpm); as a secondary outcome, mean differences in CC depth were assessed. From 2/2012 to 5/2015, 1464 subjects were enrolled and 522 subjects completed a skills assessment. The mean CC rates were 87.7(VO) cpm and 89.3 (VSI) cpm; we concluded non-inferiority for VO based on a mean difference of -1.6 (90% CI: -5.2, 2.1). The mean CC depth was 40.2 mm (VO) and 45.8 mm (VSI) with a mean difference of-5.6 (95% CI: -7.6, -3.7). Results were similar after multivariate regression adjustment. Conclusions—In this large prospective trial of CPR skill retention, VO training yielded a non-inferior difference in CC rate compared to VSI training. CC depth was greater in the VSI group. These findings suggest a potential trade-off in efforts for broad dissemination of basic CPR skills; VO training might allow for greater scalability and dissemination, but with a potential reduction in CC depth.
机译:背景技术CPR在美国的培训率很低,突出了开发简单的CPR教育方法,具有更广泛的传播潜力。确保长期技能保留所需的最低培训仍然是较差的。我们将CPR技能保留与随机培训的劳动者培训进行比较,以培训视频Serf指令套件(VSI;与Manikin)培训的那些。我们假设VO培训对于胸部压缩(CC)速率是非劣等的VSI方法。方法和结果 - 我们使用多中心务实设计对医院心脏单位进行高风险心脏病患者家庭成员进行了临床集群随机试验。在使用志愿者培训师出院之前,八位医院随机提供VO或VSI培训。 CPR技能在培训后六个月进行了评估。与VSI相比,使用vo培训的平均CC速率与每分钟的8cc(CPM)设定的非劣级裕度进行评估;作为次要结果,评估了CC深度的平均差异。从2012年/ 2012年到5/2015年,注册了1464名受试者,522名受试者完成了技能评估。平均CC率为87.7(VO)CPM和89.3(VSI)CPM;基于-1.6的平均差异,我们总结了VO的非自卑感(90%CI:-5.2,2.1)。平均CC深度为40.2毫米(VO)和45.8毫米(VSI),平均差异为-5.6(95%CI:-7.6,-3.7)。多元回归调整后结果类似。结论 - 在这一大型前瞻性试验对CPR技能保留,与VSI培训相比,VO培训产生了CC率的非差异差异。 VSI组中的CC深度更大。这些调查结果表明,在广泛传播基本CPR技能的努力中潜在的权衡; VO培训可能允许更大的可扩展性和传播,但CC深度潜在降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号