首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions >Utility of 30-Day Continuous Ambulatory Monitoring to Identify Patients With Delayed Occurrence of Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
【24h】

Utility of 30-Day Continuous Ambulatory Monitoring to Identify Patients With Delayed Occurrence of Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

机译:30天连续动态监测的效用,以鉴定经沟管主动脉瓣膜置换经术后房室间嵌段延迟发生的患者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Mechanical injury in the conduction system requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) associated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedure is a common complication. The objective of this study was to use ambulatory monitor BodyGuardian to assess late occurrence of atrioventricular block (AVB) after TAVR. METHODS: This prospective study evaluated 365 patients who underwent TAVR at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota between June 2016 and August 2017. Patients who received PPM for bradycardia after TAVR before discharge were considered as the PPM group. Those not requiring PPM received a BodyGuardian system (BodyGuardian group) for 30 days of continuous monitoring. Primary end point was Mobitz II or third-degree atrioventricular block (II/III AVB) at 30-day follow-up. RESULTS: Of 365 patients, 74 who had a PPM or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator before TAVR and 94 who were enrolled in other studies were excluded. Of 197 patients enrolled in the study, 70 (35.5%) received PPM and 127 had BodyGuardian before the hospital dismissal. Eleven of 127 (8.6%) BodyGuardian group required PPM within 30 days after TAVR for late occurrence of symptomatic bradycardia. In total, 33 of 197 (16.7%) patients developed I I/Ill AVB (24 before and 9 after discharge). Thirty-four patients had preexisting right bundle branch block. Of them, 16 (47%) developed ll/lll AVB. Of 53 patients who developed new left bundle branch block after TAVR, 14% progressed to ll/lll AVB within 30 days.CONCLUSIONS: In patients without a standard post-TAVR pacing indication, yet a potential risk to develop AVB, a strategy of 30-day monitoring identifies additional patients who require permanent pacing.
机译:背景:需要永久起搏器(PPM)的导通系统中的机械损伤与经沟管主动脉瓣膜更换(TAVR)程序是一种常见的并发症。本研究的目的是利用动态监测卫生防护人员评估TAVR之后的学院间块(AVB)的后期发生。方法:该前瞻性研究评估了365例在2016年6月至2017年之间接受了Mayo Clinic,明尼苏达州Mayo Clinic的患者的365名患者,2017年至8月。在发出前接受TAVR后对Bradycardia的PPM进行PPM的患者被视为PPM组。那些不需要PPM的人持续监测30天的保镖系统(保镖组)。主要终点是Mobitz II或第三度房室间块(II / III AVB)在30天的随访中。结果:365例患者,74名患者在TAVR和94之前进行PPM或植入的心脏病除颤器,被排除在其他研究中。 197例患者入学的患者,70(35.5%)收到PPM,127岁在医院解雇前有卫生卫生间。十一(8.6%)卫生卫生组在TAVR后30天内需要PPM,以便发生症状性心动过缓。总共33吐(16.7%)患者开发了I / IAR AVB(24之前和排放后9)。三十四名患者预先存在右束分支块。其中,16(47%)开发出LL / LLL AVB。在TAVR后开发出新的左束分支块的53名患者中,14%进展到LL / LLL AVB在30天内。结论:在没有标准的TAVR起搏指示的患者中,发展AVB的潜在风险,策略为30 - 日本监测识别需要永久性起搏的额外患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号