首页> 外文期刊>China Economic Review >Does the Granary County Subsidy Program Lead to manipulation of grain production data in China?
【24h】

Does the Granary County Subsidy Program Lead to manipulation of grain production data in China?

机译:粮仓县补贴方案是否导致在中国的粮食生产数据进行操纵?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Manipulation of food production data could lead to catastrophic social and economic consequences. The accuracy of official agricultural statistics has long been questioned in China. This paper studies the linkage between agricultural production data manipulation and the Granary County Subsidy Program (GCSP). Since 2005, Chinese government gave subsidies to those counties with five-year average grain production between 1998 and 2002 more than 200 thousand tons to encourage these local governments to give priority to grain production. The prospective counties with grain production slightly below the threshold may have incentives to over-report their grain production. Based on the McCrary (2008)'s density test, this paper provides suggestive evidence of over-reporting grain production caused by the GCSP in 2005, 2006 and 2008, though the over-reporting rates are only 3%, 2%, and 1.7% respectively. The policy implication would be that fiscal distribution rules of a central government should avoid data manipulation incentives in local governments, particularly should cut the linkage to the data which are self-reported by the local governments.
机译:粮食生产数据的操纵可能导致灾难性的社会和经济后果。官方农业统计的准确性长期以来一直受到质疑。本文研究了农业生产数据操纵与粮仓县补贴计划(GCSP)之间的联系。自2005年以来,中国政府将补贴为1998年至2002年以来的五年平均粮食产量补贴,超过200万吨,以鼓励这些地方政府优先考虑粮食生产。谷物生产略低于阈值的前瞻性县可能会激励过度报告其粮食生产。本文根据MCCRARY(2008)的密度检验,提供了2005年2005年和2008年由GCSP引起的报告粮食生产的暗示证据,但报告过度报告率仅为3%,2%和1.7 % 分别。政策含义是中央政府的财政分配规则应避免地方政府的数据操纵激励,特别是应削减当地政府自我报告的数据的联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号