首页> 外文期刊>Chemical geology >Tracking Opioid Prescribing Metrics in Washington State (2012-2017): Differences by County-Level Urban-Rural and Economic Distress Classifications
【24h】

Tracking Opioid Prescribing Metrics in Washington State (2012-2017): Differences by County-Level Urban-Rural and Economic Distress Classifications

机译:跟踪华盛顿州(2012-2017)的阿片类药物规定:县级城乡和经济困境分类的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose High-risk opioid prescribing is a critical driver of prescription opioid-related morbidity and mortality. This study explored opioid prescribing patterns across urban-rural and economic distress classifications. Secondarily, this study explored the urban-rural distribution of relevant health services, economic factors, and population characteristics. Methods County-level opioid prescribing metrics were based on quarterly Washington State Prescription Monitoring Program data (2012-2017). Counties were classified using the 2013 National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties, and Washington State unemployment-based distressed areas. County-level measures from Area Health Resources Files were used to describe the urban-rural continuum. Findings Persistent economic distress was associated with higher-risk opioid prescribing. The large central metropolitan category had lower-risk opioid prescribing metrics than the other 5 urban-rural categories, which were similar to each other and not ordered by degree of rurality. High-risk prescribing declined over time, without notable trend divergence by either urban-rural or economic distress classifications. Conclusions The most striking urban-rural differences in opioid prescribing metrics were between large central metropolitan and all other categories; thus, we recommend caution when collapsing urban-rural categories for analysis. Further research is needed regarding geographic and economic patterning of opioid prescribing practices, as well as the dissemination of guidelines and best practices across the urban-rural continuum. Finally, the multiple intertwined burdens faced by rural communities-higher-risk prescribing practices, higher opioid morbidity and mortality rates, and fewer resources for primary care, mental health care, alternative pain treatment, and opioid use disorder treatment-must be addressed as an urgent public health priority.
机译:目的,高风险的阿片类药物是处方阿片类药物相关的发病率和死亡率的关键驱动因素。本研究探讨了城乡和经济困境分类的阿片类规定模式。其次,本研究探讨了相关卫生服务,经济因素和人口特征的城乡分布。方法县级阿片类药物规定指标基于季度华盛顿州处方监测计划数据(2012-2017)。县分类为县的2013年国家卫生统计中心县,以及华盛顿州失业的苦恼地区。来自地区健康资源档案的县级措施用于描述城乡连续体。调查结果持续经济困扰与更高风险的阿片类药物有关。大型中央大都市类别具有低风险的阿片类药物规定指标,比其他5个城乡类别,彼此相似,而不是按照风格程度下令。高风险规定随着时间的推移而下降,无论是城乡还是经济痛苦分类,都没有显着的趋势差异。结论Apioid规定指标中最引人注目的城乡差异在大型中央大都市和所有其他类别之间;因此,我们建议在折叠城乡分析时谨慎行事。需要进一步研究阿片类药物规定做法的地理和经济图案,以及在城乡连续内的指南和最佳实践的传播。最后,农村社区面临的多个交织的负担 - 更高风险的规定实践,更高的阿片类药物发病率和死亡率,以及初级保健,精神保健,替代疼痛治疗和阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的较少资源 - 必须作为一个紧急公共卫生优先权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号