...
首页> 外文期刊>Chemphyschem: A European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry >Explaining the Different Geometries of the Water Oxidising Complex in the Nominal S-3 State Crystal Structures of Photosystem II at 2.25 angstrom and 2.35 angstrom
【24h】

Explaining the Different Geometries of the Water Oxidising Complex in the Nominal S-3 State Crystal Structures of Photosystem II at 2.25 angstrom and 2.35 angstrom

机译:在2.25埃埃斯特罗姆和2.35埃埃斯特朗姆中,在光照II标称S-3状态晶体结构中解释水氧化复合物的不同几何形状

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Recently two atomic resolution crystal structures of Photosystem II, in the double flashed, nominal S-3 intermediate state of its Mn4Ca water oxidising complex (WOC), have been presented (Young et al., Nature 2016, 540, 453; Suga et al., Nature 2017, 543, 131). These structures are at 2.25 angstrom and 2.35 angstrom resolution, respectively. Although highly similar in most respects, the structures differ in a key region within the WOC catalytic site. In the 2.25 angstrom structure, one oxy species (O5) is observed within the WOC cavity, weakly associated with the Mn centres, similar to that seen earlier in the 1.95 angstrom XRD structure of the S-1 intermediate (Suga et al., Nature, 2015, 517, 99). In the 2.35 angstrom structure, two such species are seen (O5, O6), with the Mn centres and O5 positioned as in the 2.25 angstrom structure and an O5-O6 separation of similar to 1.5 angstrom, consistent with peroxo formation. This suggests O5 and O6 are substrate water derived species in this double flashed form. Recently we have presented (Petrie, et al., Chem. Phys. Chem., 2017) a large scale (220 atom) quantum chemical model of the Young et al. 2.25 angstrom structure, which quantitatively explains all significant features within the WOC region of that structure, particularly the positions of the metal centres and O5 group. Critical to this was our assumption of a 'low' Mn oxidation paradigm (mean S-1 Mn oxidation level of +3.0, Petrie et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015), rather than a 'high' oxidation model (mean S-1 oxidation level of +3.5), widely assumed in the literature. Here we show that our same oxidation state model predicts two classes of energetically close S-3 structural forms, analogous to the S-1 state, one with the metal centres and O5 positioned as in the 2.25 angstrom structure, and the other with the metals similarly placed, but with O5 located in the O6 position of the 2.35 angstrom structure. We show that the Suga et al. 2.35 angstrom structure is
机译:最近,已经介绍了两个原子分辨率晶体结构,在其Mn4CA水氧化复合物(WOC)的双闪蒸的标称S-3中间状态下(Young等人,自然2016,540,453; Suga等。,自然2017,543,131)。这些结构分别为2.25埃和2.35埃千埃分辨率。虽然在大多数方面非常相似,但结构在WOC催化位点内的关键区域不同。在2.25埃结构中,在WOC腔内观察到一种氧种类(O5),与Mn中心弱相关,类似于S-1中间体的1.95埃XRD结构中的前面观察到的氧化物中心(Suga等,性质。 ,2015,517,99)。在2.35埃结构中,可以看到两种这样的物种(O5,O6),Mn中心和O5位于2.25埃结构中,与o5-O6分离类似于1.5埃,与Peroxo形成一致。这表明O5和O6是这种双闪蒸形式的基底水衍生物种。最近我们已经介绍(Petrie,等,化学。物理。Chem。,2017)杨等人的大规模(220个原子)量子化学模型。 2.25埃埃结构,其定量地解释了该结构的WOC区域内的所有重要特征,特别是金属中心和O5组的位置。对此至关重要是我们对“低”Mn氧化范例的假设(平均S-1 Mn氧化水平+3.0,Petrie等,Angew。Chem。int。int。编辑。,2015),而不是“高”氧化模型(平均S-1氧化水平+3.5),广泛承担在文献中。在这里,我们表明,我们的相同的氧化状态模型预测了两种级别的能量闭合S-3结构形式,类似于S-1状态,其中金属中心和O5位于2.25埃结构中,另一个与金属相同。类似地放置,但o5位于2.35埃埃斯特罗姆结构的O6位置。我们展示了Suga等人。 2.35 Angstrom结构是

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号