...
首页> 外文期刊>Current Psychology >A Pragmatic, Step-by-Step Guide for Qualitative Methods: Capturing the Disaster and Long-Term Recovery Stories of Katrina and Rita
【24h】

A Pragmatic, Step-by-Step Guide for Qualitative Methods: Capturing the Disaster and Long-Term Recovery Stories of Katrina and Rita

机译:定性方法的实用分步指南:捕捉卡特里娜飓风和丽塔的灾难和长期恢复故事

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper commences with candid warnings about the difficulties of publishing and funding qualitative research along with a brief discussion regarding why these difficulties persist. The paper then provides a methodological tour of the qualitative portion of the Louisiana Healthy Aging Study (LHAS), a mixed-method study of psychological health, coping, and adjustment during the immediate and longer term aftermath of the 2005 Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Next, I provide a proven, pragmatic guide to navigate through a qualitative research project from development to completion. A guide for doing solo qualitative ("monkun in a cell") work is provided (Table 1) but the article focuses on the Four-Phase, Team-Based (or "Quad-Squad") Method. This method, originally designed for solo researchers, has been adapted for team-based application (including the extensive utilization of undergraduate and graduate students). The method is presented as a pragmatic and productive approach to publishing more valid, reliable, and rigorous qualitative research.
机译:本文从坦率的警告开始,以发表和资助定性研究的困难,并简要讨论为什么这些困难仍然存在。然后,本文提供了路易斯安那健康衰老研究(LHAS)定性部分的方法学考察,该研究是对2005年卡特里娜飓风和丽塔飓风的近期和长期后果进行心理健康,应对和调整的混合方法研究。接下来,我提供了一个行之有效的实用指南,以指导从开发到完成的定性研究项目。提供了进行定性(“单元格中的修士/修女”)工作的指南(表1),但本文重点介绍了基于团队的四阶段方法(或“四方小组”)。此方法最初是为单独的研究人员设计的,现已适用于基于团队的应用程序(包括对本科生和研究生的广泛利用)。该方法是一种实用且富有成果的方法,用于发布更有效,可靠和严格的定性研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号