首页> 外文期刊>Acta Horticulturae >SSR and AFLP markers for germplasm evaluation and cultivar identification in peach
【24h】

SSR and AFLP markers for germplasm evaluation and cultivar identification in peach

机译:SSR和AFLP标记用于桃种质评价和品种鉴定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Using 16 SSR (simple-sequence repeat or microsatellite) markers in a set of 212 peach and nectarine commercial cultivars it was possible to identify 87% of the accessions, and 95% when only one genotype was considered for every group of known sport mutations. Results with 47 AFLPs (Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism) in a subset of 210 cultivars were very similar: 89% of the cultivars were differentiated from the rest, and 94% when sport duplications were removed. The 43 non-melting flesh cultivars were identified by both marker types as separated from the rest, indicating their value as possible donors of new alleles to the narrow gene pool of the commercial non-melting cultivars. Our data revealed two important aspects to be considered for the test of cultivar identification. First, the existence of marker mutations, detected in both SSRs and AFLPs when comparing the fingerprints of the sports studied. And second, the departures from the assumptions of independence of markers (three pairs of SSRs were linked) and lack of subpopulation structures within the group of cultivars studied, which make the usual calculations of the probability that two cultivars are identical by chance, an underestimation of its real value. These results suggest that a solid test for cultivar identification requires information on mutation rates of the markers used and previous data on a large set of cultivars using highly polymorphic, single-locus markers of known map position. In this context, SSR markers are more adequate than AFLPs for cultivar identification.
机译:在一组212个桃和油桃商业品种中使用16个SSR(简单序列重复或微卫星)标记,可以鉴定87%的种质,而对于每组已知运动突变仅考虑一种基因型的品种,则可以鉴定95%。在210个品种的子集中,有47个AFLP(扩增片段长度多态性)的结果非常相似:89%的品种与其余品种区别开来,去除运动重复时为94%。通过将两种标记物类型与其余标记分开,鉴定出了43个非熔解肉质品种,表明它们作为新等位基因可能向商业非熔解品种的狭窄基因库供体的价值。我们的数据揭示了两个重要的方面,需要进行品种鉴定测试。首先,当比较所研究运动的指纹时,在SSR和AFLP中都检测到标记突变。其次,偏离了标记的独立性假设(三对SSR之间有联系)并且在所研究的品种组中缺少亚种群结构,这使得通常计算得出两个品种偶然发生相同的概率,这被低估了。真正的价值。这些结果表明,一个可靠的品种鉴定试验需要使用标记的突变率信息,以及使用已知图位的高度多态性,单基因座标记的大量品种的先前数据。在这种情况下,SSR标记比AFLP更适合用于品种鉴定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号