...
首页> 外文期刊>Cell and Tissue Research >The cell–cell junctions of mammalian testes. III. Absence of an endothelial cell layer covering the peritubular wall of the seminiferous tubules—an immunocytochemical correction of a 50-year-old error in the literature
【24h】

The cell–cell junctions of mammalian testes. III. Absence of an endothelial cell layer covering the peritubular wall of the seminiferous tubules—an immunocytochemical correction of a 50-year-old error in the literature

机译:哺乳动物睾丸的细胞 - 细胞结。 III。 没有覆盖生成小管的梗死壁的内皮细胞层 - 一种免疫细胞化学校正在文献中为50岁的误差

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the molecular biological and ultrastructural studies of the peritubular wall cells encasing the seminiferous tubules of mammalian testes, we found it necessary to characterize the outermost cell layer bordering on the interstitial space in detail. For half a century, the extremely thin cells of this monolayer have in the literature been regarded as part of a lymphatic endothelium, in particular in rodents. However, our double-label immunofluorescence microscopical results have shown that in all six mammalian species examined, including three rodent ones (rat, mouse, guinea pig), this classification is not correct: the very attenuated cells of this monolayer are not of lymphatic endothelial nature as they do not contain established endothelial marker molecules. In particular, they do not contain claudin-5-positive tight junctions, VE-cadherin-positive adherens junctions, “lymph vessel endothelium hyaluronan receptor 1” (LYVE-1), podoplanin, protein myozap and “von Willebrand Factor” (vWF). By contrast and as controls, all these established marker molecules for the lymphatic endothelial cell type are found in the endothelia of the lymph and—partly also—blood vessels located nearby in the interstitial space. Thus, our results provide evidence that the monolayer cells covering the peritubular wall do not contain endothelial marker molecules and hence are not endothelial cells. We discuss possible methodological reasons for the maintenance of this incorrect cell type classification in the literature and emphasize the value of molecular analyses using multiple cell type–specific markers, also with respect to physiology and medical sciences.
机译:在包裹哺乳动物睾丸的嗜射骨细胞的梗死壁细胞的分子生物学和超微结构研究中,我们发现有必要详细描述在间隙空间上接壤的最外细胞层。半个世纪,这种单层的极薄细胞在文献中被认为是淋巴内皮的一部分,特别是在啮齿动物中。但是,我们的双标免疫荧光显微镜结果表明,在所有六种哺乳动物物种中,包括三种啮齿动物(大鼠,小鼠,豚鼠),这种分类是不正确的:这种单层的非常衰减的细胞不是淋巴内皮的自然,因为它们不含已建立的内皮标记分子。特别是,它们不含克劳丁-5正紧密结,Ve-Cadherin阳性粘附结,“淋巴血管内皮透明质酸乳氢乳酸酐1”(Lyve-1),Podoplanin,蛋白质Myozap和“von Willebrand因子”(VWF) 。通过对比和作为对照,所有这些已建立的淋巴内皮细胞类型的标记分子在位于间隙空间附近的淋巴结内皮和部分血管的内皮中发现。因此,我们的结果提供了覆盖梗脉壁的单层细胞不含内皮标记分子,因此不是内皮细胞。我们讨论了在文献中维持这种不正确的细胞类型分类的可能方法论原因,并强调使用多种细胞类型特异性标记的分子分析的值,以及生理学和医学科学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号