首页> 外文期刊>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: Official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions >Deep sedation Vs. general anesthesia in 232 patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair using the MitraClip ? ? system
【24h】

Deep sedation Vs. general anesthesia in 232 patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair using the MitraClip ? ? system

机译:深镇静与 232例患者中的一般麻醉使用MITRACLIP进行经皮二尖瓣修复? 还是 系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives To investigate in a series of 232 patients whether the MitraClip ? procedure can be performed safely using deep sedation (DS) without general anesthesia (GA). Background Transcatheter mitral valve repair using the MitraClip ? system is a safe and effective therapy for severe mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients who are at high operative risk or are unsuitable for surgery. For these patients, avoidance of GA might be beneficial. Methods Between 2011 and 2015, we performed 232 MitraClip ? procedures for the treatment of severe MR. Of those, 76 procedures were performed using GA, while the remaining 156 procedures were performed using DS. Results Age, logistic EuroScore, severity of MR, left and right ventricular function, and renal function did not differ between the groups. The primary combined safety endpoint, which was defined as the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, conversion to surgery, major vascular complications or pneumonia, did not differ between MitraClip ? procedures performed using GA and MitraClip ? procedures performed using DS. Intraprocedural conversion to GA was required in 2% of the patients in the DS group. There were no differences in procedural success or clinical outcome between the groups at the 3‐month follow‐up. Preparation time in the catheterization laboratory and intensive care unit (ICU) stay were shorter in the DS group compared to the GA group. Conclusion The MitraClip ? implantation performed using DS is as safe and effective as MitraClip ? implantation performed using GA. ? 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
机译:目标是在一系列232名患者中进行调查吗?可以使用全身麻醉(GA)安全地使用深镇静(DS)安全地进行。背景技术经截管二尖瓣修复使用mitraclip?系统是一种安全有效的患者严重二尖瓣反流性(MR),其患者处于高手术风险或不适合手术。对于这些患者来说,避免GA可能是有益的。 2011年和2015年之间的方法,我们进行了232米特拉德利普?治疗严重先生的程序。其中,使用GA进行76种方法,而使用DS进行剩余的156个方法。结果年龄,后勤Euroscore,MR,左右心室功能的严重程度,群体之间的肾功能没有差异。主要组合安全终点,被定义为主要不良心脏和脑血管事件的发生,转化为手术,主要血管并发症或肺炎,在MITRACLIP之间没有区别?使用Ga和Mitraaclip进行的程序?使用DS执行的程序。在DS组的2%患者中需要颅脑转化为Ga。在3个月随访的群体之间的程序成功或临床结果没有差异。与GA集团相比,导管输出实验室和重症监护单元(ICU)保持较短的时间较短。结论MitraClip?使用DS进行的植入和米特拉利劳动力一样安全和有效?使用Ga进行植入。还2017年Wiley期刊,Inc。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号