...
首页> 外文期刊>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: Official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions >Association of peripheral artery disease with in‐hospital outcomes after endovascular transcatheter aortic valve replacement
【24h】

Association of peripheral artery disease with in‐hospital outcomes after endovascular transcatheter aortic valve replacement

机译:外周血动脉疾病与血管内经膜转闭管主动脉瓣膜置换术后的医院后果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) and its association with in‐hospital outcomes after endovascular transcatheter aortic valve replacement (EV‐TAVR). Background TAVR is an established treatment for patients at prohibitive, high, or intermediate surgical risk. PAD is a significant comorbidity in the determination of surgical risk. However, data on association of PAD with outcomes after EV‐TAVR are limited. Methods Patients in the National Inpatient Sample who underwent EV‐TAVR between January 1, 2012 and September 30, 2015 were evaluated. The primary outcome was in‐hospital mortality. Results A total of 51,685 patients underwent EV‐TAVR during the study period. Of these, 12,740 (24.6%) had a coexisting diagnosis of PAD. The adjusted odds for in‐hospital mortality [OR 1.08 (95% CI 0.83–1.41)], permanent pacemaker implantation [OR 0.98 (0.85–1.14)], conversion to open aortic valve replacement [OR 1.05 (0.49–2.26)], or acute myocardial infarction [OR 1.31(0.99–1.71)] were not different in patients with versus without PAD. However, patients with PAD had greater adjusted odds of vascular complications [OR 1.80 (1.50–2.16)], major bleeding [OR 1.20 (1.09–1.34)], acute kidney injury (AKI) [OR 1.19 (1.05–1.36)], cardiac complications [aOR 1.21 (1.01–1.44)], and stroke [OR 1.39(1.10–1.75)] compared with patients without PAD. Length of stay (LOS) was significantly longer for patients with PAD [7.23 (0.14) days vs. 7.11 (0.1) days, p 0.001]. Conclusion Of patients undergoing EV‐TAVR, ~25% have coexisting PAD. PAD was not associated with increased risk of in‐hospital mortality but was associated with higher risk of vascular complications, major bleeding, AKI, stroke, cardiac complications, and longer LOS.
机译:摘要目的本研究的目的是确定外周动脉疾病(PAD)的患病率及其与血管内经膜转带主动脉瓣主动脉瓣膜置换(EV-TAVR)的医院内结果的关联。背景技术TAVR是患者在抑制,高或中间手术风险下的患者的既定处理。垫是在确定外科风险的重要合作率。然而,在EV-TAVR之后有限的垫与结果相关的数据。方法评估患者在2015年1月1日至2015年9月30日期间接受EV-TAVR的全国住院病毒样本。主要结果是医院死亡率。结果在研究期间共有51,685名患者接受了EV-TAVR。其中,12,740(24.6%)的垫子共存。调整后的内部死亡率[或1.08(95%CI 0.83-1.41)],永久起搏器植入[或0.98(0.85-1.14)],转化为开放主动脉瓣替换[或1.05(0.49-2.26)],或急性心肌梗死[或1.31(0.99-1.71)]与没有垫的患者没有不同。然而,患有垫的患者的血管并发症的可能性更大[或1.80(1.50-2.16)],重大出血[或1.20(1.09-1.34)],急性肾损伤(AKI)[或1.19(1.05-1.36)],与没有垫的患者相比,心脏并发症[AOR 1.21(1.01-1.44)]和中风[或1.39(1.10-1.75)]。垫患者保持寿命长度(LOS)显着更长[7.23(0.14)天与7.11(0.1)天,P& 0.001]。结论患者进行EV-TAVR,〜25%的共存垫。垫与医院内死亡率的风险增加无关,但与血管并发症的风险较高,重大出血,AKI,中风,心脏并发症以及更长的洛杉矶。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号