...
首页> 外文期刊>Catena: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Soil Science Hydrology-Geomorphology Focusing on Geoecology and Landscape Evolution >Flood susceptibility assessment based on a novel random Naive Bayes method: A comparison between different factor discretization methods
【24h】

Flood susceptibility assessment based on a novel random Naive Bayes method: A comparison between different factor discretization methods

机译:基于新型随机幼稚贝叶斯法的洪水敏感性评估:不同因素离散化方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Random Naive Bayes (RNB) is a machine learning method that uses the Random Forest (RF) structure to optimize Naive Bayes (NB). It is interesting to see whether RNB could optimize NB and achieve satisfied assessment results like RF in the flood susceptibility assessment study. RNB has rarely been used in study of using machine learning methods to spatially analyze natural disasters, and thus it was selected as the analysis method. Based on the data feasibility, 12 spatial factors that affect the occurrence and spatial distribution of floods were selected. To avoid the influence of subjective equal-interval classification method, natural breaks and quantile method were used to discretize factors with continuous values, respectively. Here, a recently proposed repeatedly random sampling method was adopted to select negative samples for RNB to generate a most accurate classifier (MAC) that was employed to compute the probability of flood occurrence in the study area. Consequently, this paper adopted the integrated framework of GIS and RNB to spatially assess the flood susceptibility using the Wanan County in China as an instance. The results demonstrated that when integrated with the repeatedly random sampling method, the MAC-based flood susceptibility maps corresponding to different factor discretization methods were similar, meaning this framework can effectively avoid the effects caused by different factor discretization methods. Also, to testify the classification performance of RNB, RF and NB were chosen to compare the classification performance with it. The results indicated the classification performance in the order of RF > RNB > NB. This means RNB is able to achieve better classification performance than NB, but it exists limitations when compared with traditional strong classifiers like RF. The findings of this paper proved that RNB is a feasible approach for natural hazard susceptibility assessment.
机译:随机野贝雷斯(RNB)是一种机器学习方法,使用随机森林(RF)结构来优化朴素贝叶斯(NB)。有趣的是,有趣的是,RNB是否可以优化NB并实现洪水敏感性评估研究中的RF等评估结果。 RNB很少用于研究使用机器学习方法来空间分析自然灾害,因此选择了分析方法。根据数据可行性,选择了12种影响洪水发生和空间分布的空间因素。为避免主观平等间隔分类方法的影响,使用自然破裂和分量方法分别离散与连续值的因素。这里,采用最近提出的重复采样方法来选择用于RNB的阴性样本,以产生用于计算研究区域中洪水发生概率的最精确的分类器(MAC)。因此,本文采用了GIS和RNB的综合框架,以在中国作为一个例子中使用万南县的洪水敏感性。结果表明,当与重复的随机采样方法集成时,对应于不同因子离散化方法的基于MAC的洪水敏感性图是相似的,这意味着该框架可以有效地避免由不同因子离散化方法引起的效果。此外,为了作证RNB的分类性能,选择RF和NB以将分类性能与其进行比较。结果表明了RF> RNB> NB的顺序分类性能。这意味着RNB能够实现比NB更好的分类性能,但与RF这样的传统强大分类器相比,它存在限制。本文的调查结果证明,RNB是一种可行的自然灾害易感性评估方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号