...
首页> 外文期刊>Catena: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Soil Science Hydrology-Geomorphology Focusing on Geoecology and Landscape Evolution >Gully erosion susceptibility mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis techniques
【24h】

Gully erosion susceptibility mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis techniques

机译:基于GIS的多标准决策分析技术的沟壑腐蚀敏感性映射

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This research introduces a scientific methodology for gully erosion susceptibility mapping (GESM) that employs geography information system (GIS)-based multi-criteria decision analysis. The model was tested in Semnan Province, Iran, which has an arid and semi-arid climate with high susceptibility to gully erosion. The technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) multi criteria decision-making (MCDM) models were integrated. The important aspect of this research is that it did not require gully erosion inventory maps for GESM. Therefore, the proposed methodology could be useful in areas with missing or incomplete data. Fifteen variables reflecting topographic, hydrologic, geologic, environmental and soil characteristics were selected as proxies for gully erosion conditioning factors (GECFs). The experiment was conducted using 200 sample points that were selected randomly in the study area, and the weights of criteria (GECFs) were obtained using the AHP model. In the next step, the TOPSIS model was applied, and the weight of each alternative (sample points) was obtained. Kriging and inverse distance-weighted (IDW) methods were used for interpolation and GESM. Natural break method was used for classifying gully erosion susceptibility into five classes, from very low to very high. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used for validation. AHP results showed that distance to stream (0.14), slope degree (0.13) and distance to road (0.12) played major roles in controlling gully erosion in the study area. The values of points obtained by using the TOPSIS model ranged from 0.321 to 0.808. Verification results showed that kriging had higher prediction accuracy than IDW. The GESM results obtained by this methodology can be used by decision makers and managers to plan preventive measures and reduce damages due to gully erosion.
机译:本研究介绍了采用地理信息系统(GIS)的沟壑腐蚀敏感性映射(GESM)的科学方法论。基于多标准决策分析。该模型在伊朗半岛省进行了测试,该模型具有干旱和半干旱的气候,对沟壑侵蚀的敏感性高。通过相似性与理想解决方案(TOPSIS)的优先顺序和分析层次处理(AHP)多标准决策(MCDM)模型进行偏好的技术。这项研究的重要方面是它不需要GULLY侵蚀库存地图。因此,所提出的方法在缺失或不完整数据的区域中可能有用。反映了地形,水文,地质,环境和土壤特性的十五个变量作为沟壑侵蚀调理因素(GECF)的代理。使用200在研究区域中随机选择的200个样品进行实验,并且使用AHP模型获得标准的重量(GECFS)。在下一步中,施加了Topsis模型,获得了每个替代(采样点)的重量。 Kriging和逆距离加权(IDW)方法用于插值和GESM。自然断裂方法用于将GULLY腐蚀易感性分为五类,从非常低到非常高。 ROC曲线(AUC)下的区域用于验证。 AHP结果表明,距离流(0.14),坡度(0.13)和与道路距离(0.12)的距离在控制研究区控制沟壑侵蚀方面发挥了重要作用。通过使用TOPSIS模型获得的点值范围为0.321至0.808。验证结果表明,Kriging的预测精度高于IDW。通过该方法获得的GESM结果可以由决策者和管理者使用,规划预防措施,并减少由于沟壑侵蚀为损害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号