...
首页> 外文期刊>Catena: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Soil Science Hydrology-Geomorphology Focusing on Geoecology and Landscape Evolution >Effects of pre-fire site preparation and post-fire erosion barriers on soil erosion after a wildfire in NW Spain
【24h】

Effects of pre-fire site preparation and post-fire erosion barriers on soil erosion after a wildfire in NW Spain

机译:火灾前现场准备和火灾后侵蚀障碍对NW西班牙野火后土壤侵蚀的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Thousands of hectares of conifer plantations are affected every year by wildfire and subsequent erosion in the Mediterranean region. However, little is known about how post-fire erosion is influenced by the mechanical site preparation (MSP) techniques used at plantation establishment. Such information is needed for planning further reforestation, for reducing the hydrological impact of wildfire and subsequent soil degradation, and for favouring the natural resilience of perturbed ecosystems. Here we present a study conducted in NW Spain to evaluate how two MSP techniques commonly used at plantation establishment- hole planting and contour rip-plowing-, affected post-wildfire soil erosion and some edaphic properties (carbon content, penetration resistance, bulk density and aggregate stability) compared to the absence of intervention. The possible relationships between the soil properties and post-fire soil erosion were also examined. Finally, the effectiveness of erosion barriers, installed in burned sites originally established by hole planting and contour rip-plowing was evaluated. At the end of the two-year long study period, the accumulated soil loss was significantly lower in the contour rip-plowing treatment (0.7 Mg ha(-1)) than in the hole planting treatment (6.7 Mg ha(-1)) and the no intervention treatment (4.9 Mg ha(-1)), but did not differ in the latter two treatments. Erosion barriers did not reduce post-fire soil erosion, which varied from 2.1 Mg ha(-1) in the contour rip-plowing + erosion barriers treatment to 8.3 Mg ha(-1) in the hole planting + erosion barriers treatment. Soil loss was related to soil burn severity. No significant relationship was observed between sediment production and any of the soil properties considered. The recovery of vegetation cover was not affected by the site preparation technique used. The study findings can be applied to reforestation planning and post-fire emergency stabilization actions.
机译:野火每年受到数千种种植园的每年受到野火和随后的地中海地区的侵蚀。然而,关于火灾后侵蚀的影响很少是众所周知的,用于在种植园建立中使用的机械部位制备(MSP)技术。计划进一步重新造林需要此类信息,以降低野火的水文影响和随后的土壤退化,以及有利于扰动生态系统的自然复原力。在这里,我们提出了一项在西班牙进行的一项研究,以评估常用于种植园建立 - 孔种植和轮廓撕裂的MSP技术的研究,影响野战后土壤侵蚀和一些涂料性能(碳含量,渗透性,散装密度和与缺乏干预相比,聚合稳定性。还检查了土壤性质和火灾后土壤侵蚀之间的可能关系。最后,评估了侵蚀屏障的有效性,安装在最初由孔种植和轮廓撕裂犁的燃烧的位点。在两年的研究期结束时,轮廓撕裂处理(0.7mg HA(-1))中累积的土壤损失明显低于孔种植处理(6.7mg ha(-1))而无干预治疗(4.9 mg ha(-1)),但在后两种治疗中没有不同。侵蚀障碍并没有减少火灾后土壤侵蚀,从2.1毫克HA(-1)变化在轮廓撕裂+侵蚀屏障屏障中,在孔种植+腐蚀屏障治疗中的8.3mg ha(-1)。土壤损失与土壤烧伤严重程度有关。在沉积物生产和考虑的任何土壤属性之间没有观察到显着的关系。植被覆盖的恢复不受所用现场制备技术的影响。研究结果可以应用于重新造林规划和火灾后应急稳定行动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号