...
首页> 外文期刊>Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology: A Journal of Imaging in Diagnosis and Treatment >Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization Alone with Biliary Drainage Compared to a Combination of Simultaneous Portal Vein, Right Hepatic Vein Embolization and Biliary Drainage in Klatskin Tumor
【24h】

Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization Alone with Biliary Drainage Compared to a Combination of Simultaneous Portal Vein, Right Hepatic Vein Embolization and Biliary Drainage in Klatskin Tumor

机译:单独的门静脉栓塞与胆道引流相比,与同时门静脉,右肝静脉栓塞和Klatskin肿瘤的胆量引流相比

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose To compare estimated future remnant liver (FRL) growth following portal vein embolization or liver venous deprivation (LVD) (combined PVE and right hepatic vein embolization), before surgery for a Klatskin tumor in patients who receive intraoperative biliary drainage or before venous interventional radiology. Material and Method Six patients underwent LVD and six underwent PVE alone before hepatectomy for a Klatskin tumor. Before embolization, the FRL ratio, prothrombin time and bilirubin levels were similar in both groups. The FRL was determined before and 3?weeks after embolization by enhanced CT. PVE was performed with n -butyl-2-cyanoacrylate, and the right hepatic vein was embolized with vascular plugs during the same procedure. Biliary drainage was performed percutaneously or by endoscopy. Post-hepatectomy liver function and duration of hospital stay were assessed. Results There were no adverse events. The median FRL ratio was significantly higher following LVD than after PVE 58% (54–71) and 37% (30–44), respectively, p ?=?0.017. The FRL volume after embolization was 1.6 times higher after LVD than PVE ( p ?=?0.016). Four and five patients were operated in the LVD and PVE groups, respectively. There was a trend toward a shorter median postoperative hospital stay and 90-day mortality in the LVD versus PVE group: 14 versus 44?days, ( p ?=?0.114) and 0 versus two deaths ( p ?=?0.429), respectively. Conclusions LVD associated with biliary drainage is safe and results in a better FRL ratio than biliary drainage associated with PVE alone.
机译:目的,将估计的未来残余肝(FRL)生长在接受术中胆道引流或静脉介入放射学前患者的肺炎患者之前进行门静脉栓塞或肝静脉剥夺(LVD)(联合PVE和肝静脉栓塞)。 。材料和方法六名患者在肝脏切除术前接受了LVD和六个接受的PVE术治疗Klatspolecy。在栓塞之前,两个组中的FRL比率,凝血酶原时间和胆红素水平相似。通过增强CT栓塞后,FRL在之前和3周内确定。用N-丁基-2-氰基丙烯酸酯进行PVE,并且在相同的程序期间将右肝静脉栓塞血管塞。胆道引流经皮或通过内镜检查进行。评估了肝切除术后肝功能和住院时间持续时间。结果没有不良事件。在LVD之后的中位FRL比显着高于PVE 58%(54-71)和37%(30-44),P?= 0.017。栓塞后的FRL体积比PVE在LVD后的1.6倍(P?= 0.016)。四和五名患者分别在LVD和PVE组中运行。在LVD与PVE组中较短的术后医院住宿和90天死亡率较短,分别为44天,(P?= 0.114)分别分别为(P?= 0.429) 。结论LVD与胆道引流相关的LVD是安全的,并且与单独的PVE相关的胆道引流效果更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号