首页> 外文期刊>Acta ophthalmologica >Reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements in patients with age-related macular degeneration using 3D Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Topcon 3D-OCT 1000).
【24h】

Reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements in patients with age-related macular degeneration using 3D Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Topcon 3D-OCT 1000).

机译:使用3D傅里叶域光学相干断层扫描(OCT)(Topcon 3D-OCT 1000)对年龄相关性黄斑变性患者进行视网膜厚度测量的可重复性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: Conventional time-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) has become an important tool for following dry or exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Fourier-domain three-dimensional (3D) OCT was recently introduced. This study tested the reproducibility of 3D-OCT retinal thickness measurements in patients with dry and exudative AMD. METHODS: Ten eyes with dry AMD and 12 eyes with exudative AMD were included in the study. Sets of three OCT 6 x 6-mm raster scans were taken by one operator. Mean retinal thickness was calculated for 36 areas. Coefficients of variation (CoV) were calculated for each patient and area. For analysis, two separate areas (central and peripheral) were defined. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were applied to all 36 subfields in order to analyse possible differences in CoV and mean retinal thickness between dry and exudative AMD. RESULTS: Mean retinal thickness values were significantly larger in the central area in exudative AMD (p < 0.001). Mean CoV for exudative AMD was 3.7% (standard deviation [SD] 1.4%). Mean CoV for dry AMD was 1.8 (SD 0.6%). The reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements was significantly less in exudative AMD (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Reproducibility of 3D-OCT retinal thickness measurements was good in both groups. However, reproducibility was significantly better in dry AMD than in exudative AMD.
机译:目的:常规时域光学相干断层扫描(OCT)已成为追踪干燥或渗出性年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)的重要工具。最近引入了傅立叶域三维(3D)OCT。这项研究测试了干燥和渗出性AMD患者的3D-OCT视网膜厚度测量的可重复性。方法:本研究包括10眼干性AMD眼和12眼渗出性AMD眼。一位操作员进行了三组OCT 6 x 6毫米光栅扫描。计算了36个区域的平均视网膜厚度。计算每个患者和每个区域的变异系数(CoV)。为了进行分析,定义了两个单独的区域(中央和外围)。将广义估计方程(GEE)应用于所有36个子域,以分析干燥和渗出性AMD之间CoV和平均视网膜厚度的可能差异。结果:渗出性AMD中心区域的平均视网膜厚度值明显更大(p <0.001)。渗出性AMD的平均CoV为3.7%(标准偏差[SD]为1.4%)。干性AMD的平均CoV为1.8(标准差为0.6%)。在渗出性AMD中,视网膜厚度测量的可重复性明显较低(p = 0.009)。结论:3D-OCT视网膜厚度测量的可重复性在两组中均良好。但是,干性AMD的重现性明显优于渗出性AMD。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号