首页> 外文期刊>Behavioral Ecology >Provisioning tactics of great tits (Parus major) in response to long-term brood size manipulations differ across years
【24h】

Provisioning tactics of great tits (Parus major) in response to long-term brood size manipulations differ across years

机译:在多年来的长期育雏尺寸操纵中提供伟大山雀(Parus Major)的策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Parents provisioning their offspring can adopt different tactics to meet increases in offspring demand. In this study, we experimentally manipulated brood demand in free living great tits (Parus major) via brood size manipulations and compared the tactics adopted by parents in 2 successive years (2010 and 2011) with very different ecological conditions. In 2011, temperatures were warmer, there were fewer days with precipitation, and caterpillars (the preferred prey of great tits) made up a significantly larger proportion of the diet. In this "good" year, parents responded to experimental increases in brood demand by decreasing mean inter-visit intervals (IVIs) and reducing prey selectivity, which produced equal average long-term delivery of food to nestlings across the brood size treatments. In 2010, there was no evidence for effects of brood size manipulations on mean IVIs or prey selectivity. Consequently, nestlings from enlarged broods experienced significantly lower long-term average delivery rates compared with nestlings from reduced broods. In this "bad" year, parents also exhibited changes in the variance in inter-visit intervals (IVIs) as a function of treatment that were consistent with variance-sensitive foraging theory: variance in IVIs tended to be lowest for reduced broods and highest for enlarged broods. Importantly, this pattern differed significantly from that observed in the "good" year. We therefore found some support for variance-sensitive provisioning in the year with more challenging ecological conditions. Taken together, our results show that variation in brood demand can result in markedly different parental foraging tactics depending on ecological conditions.
机译:父母提供后代的父母可以采用不同的策略来满足后代需求的增加。在这项研究中,我们通过育雏尺寸操纵在自由生活巨型山雀(Parus Major)的托管需求并将父母通过的策略与2年级(2010年和2011年)进行比较,具有非常不同的生态条件。 2011年,温度温暖,沉淀较少,毛虫(伟大山雀的首选猎物)弥补了饮食比例明显更大。在这个“良好”的一年中,父母通过减少平均访问间隔(IVIS)并降低猎物选择性,对备属需求的实验增加进行了反应的实验性能,从而为携带的巢穴大小处理等平均平均长期交付食物。 2010年,没有证据表明育雏大小操纵对平均IVIS或猎物选择性的影响。因此,与减少巢穴的雏鸟相比,扩大育雏的雏鸟显着降低了长期平均交付率。在这个“糟糕的”一年中,父母还表现出在访问间隔(IVIS)的变化中的变化,作为与方差敏感的觅食理论一致的治疗功能:IVIS的差异往往是降低育雏和最高的放大育雏。重要的是,这种模式在“良好”一年中观察到的这种模式有显着不同。因此,我们发现一些对年度的方差敏感拨备的支持,具有更具挑战性的生态条件。我们的结果表明,根据生态条件,托在需求的变化可能会导致良性的家长觅食策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号