首页> 外文期刊>Acta horticulturae et regiotecturae >COMPARISON OF VOLUMETRIC AND DEFLAMETRIC METHOD WITH WIND EROSION EQUATION (WEQ) TO DETERMINE SOIL EROSION BY WIND EVENTS ON SELECTED SOIL UNIT
【24h】

COMPARISON OF VOLUMETRIC AND DEFLAMETRIC METHOD WITH WIND EROSION EQUATION (WEQ) TO DETERMINE SOIL EROSION BY WIND EVENTS ON SELECTED SOIL UNIT

机译:体积折旧法与风蚀方程(WEQ)确定土壤单元风蚀确定土壤侵蚀的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite the fact that wind erosion seriously affects the sustainable use of land in large part of the world and even though in Slovakia there is not that big percentage of agricultural land influence by wind erosion it still has an effect on the soil.Valid wind erosion model that predicts wind-blown mass transport on regional scale is lacking. The objective of this research was to compare two empiric methods to determine wind erosion. One of them is deflametric method, in which we capture soil unitsin one hour during wind erosion events. Second method we used was volumetric method where we calculate amount of eroded soil behind the wind barrier. With deflametric method we determined that actual wind speed needed to lift and carry soil unites is 9-10 m.s~(-1). With volumetric calculation we found out that our measurement is 1.7 times higher than in WEQ model. We can say that models can portray certain areas and soil types, but only field measurement can provide precise amount of eroded soil on particular land.
机译:尽管风蚀严重影响了世界上大部分地区的土地可持续利用,尽管在斯洛伐克,风蚀对农业用地的影响并不大,但仍然对土壤产生影响。预测缺乏区域规模的风吹式大众运输。本研究的目的是比较两种确定风蚀的经验方法。其中之一是火焰测定法,在风蚀事件中,我们在一小时内捕获土壤单位。我们使用的第二种方法是体积法,该方法可以计算挡风玻璃后面的侵蚀土壤量。通过火焰法,我们确定了提升和搬运土壤单位所需的实际风速为9-10 m.s〜(-1)。通过体积计算,我们发现测量值比WEQ模型高1.7倍。我们可以说模型可以描绘某些区域和土壤类型,但是只有实地测量才能提供特定土地上精确数量的侵蚀土壤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号