...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Ornithologica >The design of artificial nestboxes for the study of secondary hole-nesting birds: a review of methodological inconsistencies and potential biases
【24h】

The design of artificial nestboxes for the study of secondary hole-nesting birds: a review of methodological inconsistencies and potential biases

机译:用于研究次生洞巢鸟类的人工巢箱的设计:方法学上的矛盾和潜在的偏见

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The widespread use of artificial nestboxes has led to significant advances in our knowledge of the ecology, behaviour and physiology of cavity nesting birds, especially small passerines. Nestboxes have made it easier to perform routine monitoring and experimental manipulation of eggs or nestlings, and also repeatedly to capture, identify and manipulate the parents. However, when comparing results across study sites the use of nestboxes may also introduce a potentially significant confounding variable in the form of differences in nestbox design amongst studies, such as their physical dimensions, placement height, and the way in which they are constructed and maintained. However, the use of nestboxes may also introduce an unconsidered and potentially significant confounding variable due to differences in nestbox design amongst studies, such as their physical dimensions, placement height, and the way in which they are constructed and maintained. Here we review to what extent the characteristics of artificial nestboxes (e.g. size, shape, construction material, colour) are documented in the `methods' sections of publications involving hole-nesting passerine birds using natural or excavated cavities or artificial nestboxes for reproduction and roosting. Despite explicit previous recommendations that authors describe in detail the characteristics of the nestboxes used, we found that the description of nestbox characteristics in most recent publications remains poor and insufficient. We therefore list the types of descriptive data that should be included in the methods sections of relevant manuscripts and justify this by discussing how variation in nestbox characteristics can affect or confound conclusions from nestbox studies. We also propose several recommendations to improve the reliability and usefulness of research based on long-term studies of any secondary hole-nesting species using artificial nestboxes for breeding or roosting.
机译:人工巢箱的广泛使用已使我们在洞巢鸟(尤其是小型雀形目鸟)的生态,行为和生理知识方面取得了长足的进步。巢箱使对鸡蛋或雏鸟的常规监视和实验操作变得更加容易,并且可以重复捕获,识别和操纵父母。但是,在比较各个研究地点的结果时,巢箱的使用也可能会引入潜在的显着混淆变量,其形式为研究之间巢箱设计的差异,例如它们的物理尺寸,放置高度以及它们的构造和维护方式。但是,由于研究之间巢箱设计的差异,例如巢箱的物理尺寸,放置高度以及构造和维护方式的差异,巢箱的使用也可能会引入未考虑到的潜在潜在的混淆变量。在这里,我们回顾了出版物的“方法”部分在多大程度上记录了人工巢箱的特征(例如大小,形状,建筑材料,颜色),涉及使用自然或挖空的腔巢雀形雀或人工巢箱进行繁殖和栖息。尽管作者有明确的先前建议,详细描述了所用嵌套盒的特征,但我们发现,在最近的出版物中,对嵌套盒特征的描述仍然很差且不够。因此,我们列出了相关手稿的方法部分应包括的描述性数据类型,并通过讨论巢箱特征的变化如何影响或混淆巢箱研究的结论来证明这一点。我们还基于使用人工巢箱进行育种或栖息的任何次级孔巢物种的长期研究,提出了一些提高研究可靠性和实用性的建议。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号