首页> 外文期刊>Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica >Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements taken with the Pentacam, Orbscan Hz and IOLMaster in myopic and emmetropic eyes
【24h】

Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements taken with the Pentacam, Orbscan Hz and IOLMaster in myopic and emmetropic eyes

机译:在近视眼和正视眼中使用Pentacam,Orbscan Hz和IOLMaster进行前房深度测量的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: This study determined to assess the degree of agreement between anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements obtained using three different devices and to analyse the relationship between ACD and spherical equivalent (SE) refraction.Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 42 eyes of 42 patients with a mean SE of, 4.69 ± 4.61 D (range 0.00 D to, 14.88 D) were analysed. Measurements of ACD between the corneal epithelium and the anterior surface of the crystalline lens, obtained using the Pentacam, Orbscan Hz and IOLMaster, were compared. The relationships between SE and ACD measurements obtained with different devices were also investigated. The results were analysed using Bland-Altman analyses, single-sample Mest and Pearson's correlation test. Results: Orbscan ACD measurements were an average of 0.05 mm less than Pentacam measurements (p = 0.01). IOLMaster measurements were an average of 0.06 mm less than Orbscan measurements (p < 0.001). None of the ACD values measured by any of the devices were correlated with increasing SE (p > 0.05 for all). There was a weak positive correlation between SE and the difference in ACD measurements with Pentacam and Orbscan (p = 0.04); however, the differences between Pentacam and IOLMaster ACD measurements and Orbscan and IOLMaster ACD measurements seemed to be independent of SE (p = 0.17 and p = 0.54, respectively).Conclusions: The ACD in clinically normal eyes is measured differently by various non-ultrasonic devices. However, the observed mean error between these modalities is too small to create any noticeable difference in refractive outcome. No significant relationship was found between SE and ACD measurements obtained by Pentacam, Orbscan or IOLMaster.
机译:目的:本研究旨在评估使用三种不同设备获得的前房深度(ACD)测量值之间的一致性程度,并分析ACD与球面等效(SE)折射之间的关系。方法:在本横断面研究中,有42只眼分析了42名平均SE为4.69±4.61 D(0.00 D至14.88 D)的患者。比较了使用Pentacam,Orbscan Hz和IOLMaster获得的角膜上皮和晶状体前表面之间的ACD测量值。还研究了使用不同设备获得的SE和ACD测量值之间的关系。使用Bland-Altman分析,单样本Mest和Pearson相关检验分析结果。结果:Orbscan ACD测量值平均比Pentacam测量值小0.05 mm(p = 0.01)。 IOLMaster测量值比Orbscan测量值平均小0.06 mm(p <0.001)。任何设备测得的ACD值均未与SE升高相关(所有p> 0.05)。 SE与Pentacam和Orbscan的ACD测量值之间的差异呈弱正相关(p = 0.04)。但是,Pentacam和IOLMaster ACD测量值与Orbscan和IOLMaster ACD测量值之间的差异似乎与SE无关(分别为p = 0.17和p = 0.54)。结论:临床正常眼中的ACD是通过各种非超声检查来测量的设备。但是,在这些模态之间观察到的平均误差太小,无法在屈光结果上产生任何明显的差异。通过Pentacam,Orbscan或IOLMaster获得的SE和ACD测量之间没有发现显着关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号