首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology. >The Efficacy and Safety of 12 Weeks of Sofosbuvir and Ledipasvir versus Sofosbuvir, Ledipasvir, and Ribavirin in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C, Genotype 1, Who Have Cirrhosis and Have Failed Prior Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

The Efficacy and Safety of 12 Weeks of Sofosbuvir and Ledipasvir versus Sofosbuvir, Ledipasvir, and Ribavirin in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C, Genotype 1, Who Have Cirrhosis and Have Failed Prior Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:Sofosbuvir和Leadipasvir与Sofosbuvir,Ledipasvir和利巴韦林患者的疗效和安全性,患有肝硬化的基因型1的疗效和安全性,患有肝硬化,并且在治疗之前失败:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. The recommended therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC), genotype 1, who have cirrhosis and have failed prior therapy is 12 weeks of sofosbuvir (SOF), ledipasvir (LDV), and ribavirin (RBV). This recommendation is based on expert opinion, and the efficacy of 12 weeks of SOF/LDV compared to SOF/LDV/RBV in this patient population has not yet been established. Methods. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Two investigators independently searched electronic databases and relevant conference proceedings for randomized controlled trials comparing rates of sustained virologic response 12 weeks after therapy (SVR12) when using 12 weeks of SOF/LDV versus 12 weeks of SOF/LDV/RBV in patients with CHC, genotype 1, who have cirrhosis and failed previous therapy. Results. Our search strategy yielded 596 studies of which four met criteria for inclusion. The pooled RR of not achieving SVR12 with SOF/LDV versus SOF/LDV/RBV was 1.21 (95% CI: 0.42–3.48). Adverse events were lower in the SOF/LDV compared to the SOF/LDV/RBV arms (pooled RR: 0.11, 95% CI: 0.04–0.29). Conclusions. Our findings suggest that 12 weeks of SOF/LDV cannot be considered noninferior to 12 weeks of SOF/LDV/RBV to achieve SVR12 in patients with CHC who have cirrhosis and failed prior therapy.
机译:背景。慢性丙型肝炎患者,患有肝硬化的基因型1的推荐治疗是肝硬化(SOF),LEDIPASVIR(LDV)和利巴韦林(RBV)的12周。本建议书基于专家意见,尚未建立与本患者人口中的SOF / LDV / RBV相比的12周SOF / LDV的疗效。方法。我们进行了系统审查和荟萃分析。两位调查员独立搜查了电子数据库和相关的随机对照试验的相关会议程序,比较治疗后12周后的持续病毒学反应率(SVR12),当使用CHC,基因型患者的SOF / LDV / RBV的12周时使用12周1,患有肝硬化并失败的治疗失败。结果。我们的搜索策略产生了596项研究,其中四项符合其纳入标准。没有SOF / LDV与SOF / LDV / RBV的汇总RR为1.21(95%CI:0.42-3.48)。与SOF / LDV / RBV臂相比,SOF / LDV中的不良事件较低(合并RR:0.11,95%CI:0.04-0.29)。结论。我们的研究结果表明,12周的SOF / LDV不能被认为是SOF / LDV / RBV的12周,以实现CHC患者的SVR12,患有肝硬化并失败的前治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号