首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology >Comparison of the agonist-antagonist interaction model and the pool model for the effect of remoxipride on prolactin.
【24h】

Comparison of the agonist-antagonist interaction model and the pool model for the effect of remoxipride on prolactin.

机译:激动剂 - 拮抗剂相互作用模型与池模型对催化剂对催乳素的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

AIMS: The tolerance to the prolactin response following administration of antipsychotic drugs has been modelled as a depletion of a prolactin pool (pool model) and a model where the tolerance is explained by a feedback loop including the dopamine interaction of prolactin release (agonist-antagonist interaction model, (AAI model)). The AAI model was superior to the pool model when analyzing data from clinical trials of risperidone and paliperidone. Here we evaluated the two models using the remoxipride data, designed to challenge the short-term prolactin response, from which the original pool model was built. METHODS: The remoxipride data were collected from a study where eight healthy male subjects received two remoxipride infusions on five occasions. The intervals between the first and second dose on each occasion were 2, 8, 12, 24 and 48 h, respectively. The pool and AAI models were fitted using NONMEM. RESULTS: According to the objective function values the pool model with a circadian rhythm function fitted the data slightly better, while the AAI model was better in describing the circadian rhythm of prolactin. Visual predictive checks revealed that the models predicted the prolactin profiles equally well. CONCLUSIONS: According to the analysis performed here, a previous analysis of several clinical studies and literature reports on prolactin concentrations, it appears that the dopamine feedback mechanism included in the AAI model is better than the storage depletion mechanism in the pool model to estimate the bio-rhythm of prolactin time-course and the tolerance development across different populations, drugs, treatment schedules and time.
机译:目的:抗精神病药物施用后催乳素反应的耐受性被建模为催乳素池(池模型)的耗尽,以及通过反馈回路解释具有包括催乳素释放的多巴胺相互作用的耐受性的模型(激动剂 - 拮抗剂交互模型,(AAI模型))。当分析来自Risperidone和Paliperidone的临床试验时,AAI模型优于池模型。在这里,我们使用旨在挑战短期催乳素响应的旨在挑战原始池模型的短期催乳素响应的两种模型。方法:从研究中收集RemoXipride数据,其中八个健康男性受试者在五次接受两次Remoxipride输注。每个场合的第一和第二剂量之间的间隔分别为2,8,12,24和48小时。游泳池和AAI模型使用非梅姆配备。结果:根据目标函数值,池模型具有昼夜节律功能略微拟合数据,而AAI模型更好地描述催乳素的昼夜节律。视觉预测检查表明,模型预测催乳素谱同样良好。结论:根据此处进行的分析,对催乳素浓度的几种临床研究和文献报告的先前分析,似乎AAI模型中包含的多巴胺反馈机制优于池模型中的储存耗尽机制来估算生物 - 不同人群,药物,治疗时间表和时间的催乳素时间过程和耐受性发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号