首页> 外文期刊>Burns: Including Thermal Injury >How reliable is the charred body scale? An interobserver reliability study on scoring burned remains
【24h】

How reliable is the charred body scale? An interobserver reliability study on scoring burned remains

机译:烧焦的身体规模有多可靠? 刻痕刻痕的Interobserver可靠性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The error rates of forensic techniques need to be evaluated. The charred body scale is a method for quantifying the level of decomposition in burned remains. 51 files containing photographs of burned pigs at different stages of decomposition were scored by nine participants. Each pig in the photographs was uniformly burned to a different level (Crow Glassman Scale levels 1 to 3). The Crow Glassman Scale describes five levels of bums that include singing of hair and epidermal blistering (CGS level 1) up to complete cremation of the body reducing it to ash (CGS level 5). The three CGS levels were selected to isolate potential scoring errors that may be caused by different burn levels (not accounted for in the development of the charred body scale). Each of the 51 photograph files was scored by participants using the charred body scale as if it were a unique forensic case at an unknown initial burn level and decomposition stage. Interobserver error, hence reliability, of the scores was tested using individual and average absolute agreement interclass correlations. The charred body scale is reliable for remains burned to a Crow Glassman Scale level 1 but not in higher burn levels. It is suggested that a universal scoring method be developed that accounts for multiple burn levels in a single case. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.
机译:需要评估法医技术的错误率。烧焦的体型是一种量化烧毁遗骸中分解水平的方法。 51个包含分解不同阶段的烧猪照片的文件被九个参与者评分。照片中的每只猪都均匀地燃烧到不同的水平(乌鸦Glassman Scale 1至3)。乌鸦玻璃规模描述了五个水平的损失,包括致毛和表皮水泡(CGS含量1)的歌曲,以完成将其降低到灰分(CGS水平5)的体内的火葬。选择三个CGS水平以隔离可能由不同烧伤水平引起的潜在评分误差(未占炭黑的体型的发展)。 51张照片文件中的每一个由参与者使用烧焦的身体规模评分,好像它是一个未知的初始烧伤水平和分解阶段的唯一法医案例。 Interobserver错误,因此,使用个人和平均绝对协议进行分数来测试分数的可靠性。烧焦的体型可靠,仍然被烧毁到乌鸦玻璃规模级别1,但不在更高的烧伤水平。建议开发出一种普遍评分方法,该方法在单个案例中占多种烧伤水平。 (c)2019年Elsevier Ltd和Isbi。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号