...
首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of the history of medicine >Entitled to Addiction? Pharmaceuticals, Race, and America's First Drug War
【24h】

Entitled to Addiction? Pharmaceuticals, Race, and America's First Drug War

机译:有权成瘾? 制药,种族和美国的第一次毒品战争

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This article rethinks the formative decades of American drug wars through a social history of addiction to pharmaceutical narcotics, sedatives, and stimulants in the first half of the twentieth century. It argues, first, that addiction to pharmaceutical drugs is no recent aberration; it has historically been more extensive than "street" or illicit drug use. Second, it argues that access to psychoactive pharmaceuticals was a problematic social entitlement constructed as distinctively medical amid the racialized reforms of the Progressive Era. The resulting drug control regime provided inadequate consumer protection for some (through the FDA), and overly punitive policing for others (through the FBN). Instead of seeing these as two separate stories-one a liberal triumph and the other a repressive scourge-both should be understood as part of the broader establishment of a consumer market for drugs segregated by class and race like other consumer markets developed in the era of Progressivism and Jim Crow.
机译:本文通过对二十世纪上半叶的药物毒品,镇静剂,兴奋剂的成瘾的社会历史来重新思考美国毒品战争的形成数十年。它首先争辩说,对药物药物的成瘾是近期的差异;它历史上比“街道”或非法药物使用更广泛。其次,它争辩说,获得精神活性药物是一个有问题的社会权利,在渐进时代的种族化改革中,作为鲜明的医学。由此产生的药物管制制度为某些(通过FDA)提供了不足的消费者保护,对其他人(通过FBN)过度惩罚警察。而不是将这些作为两个独立的故事 - 一个自由主义的胜利和另一个抑制祸害 - 两者都应该被理解为更广泛建立消费者市场的消费市场,例如由课堂和比赛的竞争中等的其他消费市场进步主义和吉姆乌鸦。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号