...
首页> 外文期刊>Brachytherapy >Clinical transition to model-based dose calculation algorithm: A retrospective analysis of high-dose-rate tandem and ring brachytherapy of the cervix
【24h】

Clinical transition to model-based dose calculation algorithm: A retrospective analysis of high-dose-rate tandem and ring brachytherapy of the cervix

机译:基于模型的剂量计算算法的临床过渡 - 一种回顾性分析宫颈的高剂量速率串联和环形近距离放射治疗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract Purpose To retrospectively compare clinical dosimetry of CT-based tandem–ring treatment plans using a model-based dose calculation algorithm (MBDCA) with the standard TG-43–based dose formalism. Methods and Materials A cohort of 10 cervical cancer cohorts treated using the tandem and ring high-dose-rate applicators were evaluated. The original treatment plans were created using the department CT-based volume optimization clinical standards. All plans originally calculated with TG-43 dose calculation formalism were recalculated using the MBDCA algorithm. The gross target volume and organs at risk (OARs) were contoured on each data set?along with significant heterogeneities like air in cavity and high-density plastic tandem and ring components. The patient tissue was modeled as homogenous liquid water. D 90 , D 95 , and D 100 for gross target volume, D 0.1cm 3 , D 1.0cm 3 , and D 2.0cm 3 for bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were extracted from dose–volume histograms for TG-43 and MBDCA calculated plans. Mean absolute difference ± 2σ in the above metrics was calculated for each plan. Results Using the manual applicator contouring method, MBDCA plans ( n ?= 10) showed 2.1?±?1.1% reduction in dose to Point A average, 2.6?±?0.9% reduction in Target D 90 dose, and 2.1?±?0.3% dose reduction to OARs. Results from plans using vendor supplied solid applicator models ( n ?= 5) showed 2.2?±?1.10% reduction in dose to Point A average, 2.7?±?0.2% reduction in Target D 90 dose, and 2.7?±?1.0% dose reduction on average to OARs. Conclusion For unshielded plastic gynecologic applicators, minimal dosimetric changes (5%) were found using MBDCA relative to standard TG-43. Use of solid applicator model is more efficient than manual applicator contouring and also yielded similar MBDCA dosimetric results. Currently, TG-186 dose calculations should be reported along TG-43 until we obtain studies?with larger cohorts to fully realize the potential of MBDCA dosimetry.
机译:摘要目的要回顾基于CT基串联环处理计划的临床剂量测定方法,使用基于模型的剂量计算算法(MBDCA)与标准TG-43基剂量形式主义。方法和材料评价使用串联和环高剂量速率施加器治疗的10个宫颈癌群队列。使用基于CT的体积优化临床标准来创建原始治疗计划。使用MBDCA算法重新计算最初用TG-43剂量计算形式主义计算的所有计划。风险(桨)的总目标体积和器官在每个数据集上都是型号的?以及具有像空气中的空气和高密度塑料串联和环部件等重大异质性。患者组织被建模为均匀的液态水。对于总体目标体积,D 90,D 95和D 100,对于膀胱,直肠和Sigmoid提取D.01cm 3,D 1.0cm 3和d 2.0cm 3,从用于Tg-43和Mbdca计算的剂量直方图提取计划。每个计划计算上述度量中的平均绝对差值±2σ。结果采用手动涂抹器轮廓方法,MBDCA计划(n?= 10)显示2.1?±1.1%的剂量减少,指向平均值,2.6?±0.9%的目标d 90剂量,2.1?±0.3 %剂量减少到桨。使用供应商提供的固体涂抹器模型的计划(n?= 5)显示2.2?±1.10%的剂量减少,以指向目标d 90剂量的2.7℃,2.7?±1.0%剂量降低平均桨。结论用于非屏蔽塑料妇科涂抹器,使用MBDCA相对于标准TG-43发现最小的剂量变化(&; 5%)。使用固体涂抹器模型比手动涂抹器轮廓更有效,并且还产生了类似的MBDCA剂量效果。目前,TG-186剂量计算应沿TG-43报告,直到我们获得研究?较大的群组充分实现MBDCA剂量测定的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号