...
首页> 外文期刊>British Poultry Science >Evaluating the effects of bedding materials and elevated platforms on contact dermatitis and plumage cleanliness of commercial broilers and on litter condition in broiler houses
【24h】

Evaluating the effects of bedding materials and elevated platforms on contact dermatitis and plumage cleanliness of commercial broilers and on litter condition in broiler houses

机译:评估床上用品和升高平台的影响,对商业肉鸡的接触皮炎和羽毛清洁度以及肉鸡屋内的垃圾条件

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

1. Experiment 1, comparing wood shavings and ground straw bedding with peat, was performed on 7 broiler farms over two consecutive batches during the winter season. Experiment 2, assessing the effect of elevated (30 cm) platforms, was conducted in three farms replicated with 6 consecutive batches.2. Footpad lesions were inspected at slaughter following the Welfare Quality (R) (WQ) assessment and official programme. Hock lesions, plumage cleanliness and litter condition were assessed using the WQ assessment. Litter height, pH, moisture and ammonia were determined.3. Footpad condition on wood shavings appeared to be worse compared with peat using both methods of assessment and was accompanied by inferior hock skin health. WQ assessment resulted in poorer footpad and hock skin condition on ground straw compared with peat. Farms differed in footpad and hock skin condition. Footpad and hock lesions were not affected by platform treatment. Peat appeared more friable than ground straw. The initial pH of wood shavings was higher and moisture was lower than in peat, but at the end of production period there were no differences. Ground straw exhibited higher initial and lower end pH, and was drier in the beginning than peat. Litter condition and quality were not affected by platform treatment.4. This study provides new knowledge about the applicability of peat as broiler bedding and shows no negative effects of elevated platforms on litter condition or the occurrence of contact dermatitis in commercial environments. The results suggest a complicated relationship between litter condition, moisture and contact dermatitis. Furthermore, it is concluded that the farmer's ability to manage litter conditions is important, regardless of the chosen litter material. Peat bedding was beneficial for footpad and hock skin health compared with wood shavings and ground straw.
机译:1.实验1,将木屑和泥炭秸秆床上用品与泥炭进行比较,在冬季连续两批在7个肉鸡农场进行。实验2,评估升高(30厘米)平台的效果,在三个连续批次复制的农场中进行。在福利质量(R)(WQ)评估和官方计划之后,在屠宰中检查了脚垫病变。使用WQ评估评估Hock病变,羽毛清洁和垃圾条件。确定凋落物高度,pH,水分和氨。与泥炭使用两种评估方法相比,覆盖的脚板状况似乎更糟糕,并且伴随着卑鄙的皮肤健康。 WQ评估导致脚踏板较差,与泥炭相比秸秆上的皮肤状况。农场含有脚板和皮肤状况。 Pootppad和Hock病变不受平台治疗的影响。泥炭显得比地面吸管更易碎。木屑的初始pH值高,水分低于泥炭,但在生产期结束时没有差异。地面秸秆呈现出更高的初始和下端pH值,并且在开始时比泥炭更干燥。垃圾条件和质量不受平台治疗的影响.4。本研究为泥炭作为肉鸡床上用品的适用性提供了新的知识,并且没有显示出垃圾条件上升高平台的负面影响或在商业环境中发生接触皮炎的发生。结果表明凋落物状况,水分和接触皮炎之间的复杂关系。此外,无论选择的垃圾材料如何,农民管理垃圾条件的能力都很重要。与木屑和地面吸管相比,泥炭寝具对Footpad和Hock皮肤健康有益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号