...
首页> 外文期刊>Breast cancer research and treatment. >Use of the metastatic breast cancer progression (MBC-P) questionnaire to assess the value of progression-free survival for women with metastatic breast cancer
【24h】

Use of the metastatic breast cancer progression (MBC-P) questionnaire to assess the value of progression-free survival for women with metastatic breast cancer

机译:使用转移性乳腺癌进展(MBC-P)问卷评估患有转移性乳腺癌的妇女的无进展生存率的价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

While overall survival (OS) has historically been the primary endpoint for clinical trials in oncology, progression-free survival (PFS) has gained acceptance as a valuable surrogate endpoint. However, there are no known published reports about the value of PFS from the patient's perspective. We developed a questionnaire that included items regarding quality of life (QoL) and the importance of different treatment outcomes and presented hypothetical scenarios for which respondents were asked to indicate their preferences concerning treatments as they relate to PFS. 282 women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), ranging in age from 21 to 80 years completed an online version of this questionnaire. The majority of women (66 %) had been diagnosed with MBC within the previous 3 years and 56 % had been told their MBC had progressed. When asked to rank five treatment characteristics from most important to least important, respondents ranked "extending PFS" as the second most important treatment outcome after OS. When presented with a hypothetical scenario of two women receiving different treatments, respondents preferred the treatment that resulted in longer PFS (16 vs. 12 months), even when OS and side effects were assumed to be equal. Specifically, when asked to consider which woman within the hypothetical scenario had better QoL, physical functioning, and emotional well-being, respondents more often chose the woman who experienced longer PFS (QoL: 40 vs. 6 %; physical functioning: 32 vs. 8 %; emotional well-being: 58 vs. 6 %) compared to the woman within the hypothetical scenario who had a shorter time of progression. Respondents rated their own QoL highest after being told their MBC was responding to treatment (mean score 76.6) versus after the initial diagnosis of breast cancer and MBC (68.5 and 60.3). These findings suggest that extending PFS is an important treatment outcome and, from a patient perspective, improves overall QoL, physical functioning, and emotional well-being.
机译:虽然整体生存期(OS)历史上是肿瘤学中临床试验的主要终点,但无进展的生存期(PFS)已经获得了珍贵的代理终点。但是,没有关于PFS的价值从患者的角度出现的已知报告。我们开发了一个调查问卷,其中包括有关生活质量(QOL)的项目和不同治疗结果的重要性,并提出了被答辩者被要求表明他们与PFS相关的治疗偏好的假设情景。 282例患有转移性乳腺癌(MBC)的女性,年龄在21〜80年中完成了这个调查问卷的在线版本。大多数女性(66%)已被诊断为MBC在前3岁内,56%被告知他们的MBC已经取得了进展。当被要求将五个治疗特征排名从最重要的最重要的治疗特征时,受访者将“扩展PFS延伸”作为操作系统之后的第二个最重要的治疗结果。当呈现出在接受不同治疗的两种女性的假设情景时,受访者较好的治疗方法,即使操作系统和副作用是相等的,即使当假设OS和副作用也是平等的。具体而言,当被要求考虑假设情景中的哪个女人有更好的QoL,身体作用和情感福祉,受访者更常常选择经历了更长的PFS(QOL:40与6%;物理功能:32 Vs. 8%;情绪福祉:58与6%)与在具有较短进展时间的假设情景中的女人相比。受访者在被告知他们的MBC响应乳腺癌和MBC(68.5和60.3)的初步诊断后对治疗(平均分数76.6)与治疗(平均得分76.6)相比,受访者最高。这些发现表明,扩展PFS是一个重要的治疗结果,从患者的角度来看,改善了整体QOL,身体作用和情感福祉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号