首页> 外文期刊>Brain injury: BI >The unidimensionality of the five Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust Personality Questionnaires (BIRT-PQs) may be improved: preliminary evidence from classical psychometrics
【24h】

The unidimensionality of the five Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust Personality Questionnaires (BIRT-PQs) may be improved: preliminary evidence from classical psychometrics

机译:五个脑损伤康复信任人格调查问卷(BIRT-PQS)的单向性可能会得到改进:来自古典精神仪的初步证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To assess the internal construct validity (ICV) of the five Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust Personality Questionnaires (BIRT-PQ) with Classical Test Theory methods. Methods: Multicenter cross-sectional study involving 11 Italian rehabilitation centers. BIRT-PQs were administered to patients with severe Acquired Brain Injury and their respective caregivers. ICV was assessed by the mean of an internal consistency analysis (ICA) and a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Results: Data from 154 patients and their respective caregivers were pooled, giving a total sample of 308 subjects. Despite good overall values (alphas ranging from 0.811 to 0.937), the ICA revealed that several items within each scale did not contribute as expected to the total score. This result was confirmed by the CFA, which showed the misfit of the data to a unidimensional model (RMSEA ranging from 0.077 to 0.097). However, after accounting for local dependency found within the data, fitness to a unidimensional model improved significantly (RMSEA ranging from 0.050 to 0.062). Conclusion: Despite some limitations, our analyses demonstrated the lack of ICV for the BIRT-PQ total scores. It is envisaged that a more comprehensive ICV analysis will be performed with Rasch analysis, aiming to improve both the measurement properties and the administrative burden of each BIRT-PQ.
机译:目的:利用经典测试理论方法评估五脑损伤康复信任人格问卷(BIRT-PQ)的内部构建有效性(ICV)。方法:多中心横截面研究,涉及11个意大利康复中心。将BIRT-PQS施用于严重获得的脑损伤及其各自的护理人员患者。通过内部一致性分析(ICA)的平均值和确认因子分析(CFA)评估ICV。结果:汇集了154名患者及其各自的护理人员的数据,提供了308个科目的总样本。尽管总体值良好(从0.811到0.937的alpha,但ICA透露,每种规模内的几个项目没有贡献到总分预期。 CFA证实了该结果,表明数据的错量与单维模型(RMSEA为0.077〜0.097)。但是,在数据内发现局部依赖性后,对单维模型的适应性显着改善(RMSEA从0.050至0.062)。结论:尽管有一些局限性,我们的分析证明了BIRT-PQ总分数缺乏ICV。设想将采用Rasch分析进行更全面的ICV分析,旨在改善每个BIRT-PQ的测量属性和行政负担。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号