...
首页> 外文期刊>Brain injury: BI >Incidence of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity following traumatic brain injury using assessment tools
【24h】

Incidence of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity following traumatic brain injury using assessment tools

机译:使用评估工具后创伤性脑损伤后阵发性交感神经过度发生率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: A consensus statement proposed a diagnostic framework to systematise the identification of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH) using the PSH-Assessment Measure (PSH-AM).Methods: This retrospective study identified adult patients with a primary diagnosis of traumatic brain injury and a hospital length of stay 14days. Based on PSH-AM scores, patients were grouped into unlikely', possible', or probable' PSH. For this study, possible' and probable' PSH patients were collapsed into a single group (PSH+), and resultant data were compared with unlikely' diagnoses (PSH-). PSH-AM data were assessed against clinical diagnoses to establish sensitivity and specificity data.Results: Sixty five patients met inclusion criteria, with 45/65 (69%) categorised as either possible' or probable' PSH on the PSH-AM. Only 16 of these patients were diagnosed by clinicians. The most common symptoms triggering clinical diagnosis were tachycardia, fever and posturing. Increased respiratory rate, blood pressure or the presence of diaphoresis were not used in diagnosing PSH if the PSH-AM was not utilised. Assuming clinical assessment as the current gold standard, the PSH-AM yielded a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 35% when used retrospectively. Patients clinically diagnosed with PSH were discharged 5days earlier compared to those identified by the PSH-AM.Conclusions: The recently proposed diagnostic framework may reduce misdiagnosis, length of stay and hospitalisation costs.
机译:介绍:共识声明提出了一种使用PSH评估措施(PSH-AM)的诊断框架来系统化阵发性交感神经过度(PSH)的鉴定.Methods:该回顾性研究确定了成年患者初步诊断创伤性脑损伤和A.医院住宿时间和 14天。基于PSH-AM评分,患者被分组为不太可能“,可能的”或可能的“PSH。对于本研究,可能的'和可能的'PSH患者被折叠成单一组(PSH +),并将结果数据与不太可能的诊断(PSH-)进行比较。评估PSH-AM数据针对临床诊断,建立敏感性和特异性数据。结果:六十五名患者符合纳入标准,45/65(69%)分类为PSH-AM可能的“或可能”PSH。这些患者中只有16名被临床医生诊断出来。触发临床诊断的最常见的症状是心动过速,发烧和姿势。如果未使用PSH-AM,则不使用增加呼吸速率,血压或次干存在的存在性诊断PSH。假设临床评估作为当前的黄金标准,PSH-AM在回顾性使用时产生94%的灵敏度为94%和35%的特异性。与由PSH-AM鉴定的人相比,临床诊断为PSH的患者诊断为第5天。结论:最近提出的诊断框架可能会降低误诊,住院时间和住院费用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号