...
首页> 外文期刊>Bone marrow transplantation >Influence of alternative donor type on early survival after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia lacking a sibling donor
【24h】

Influence of alternative donor type on early survival after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia lacking a sibling donor

机译:替代供体类型对造血干细胞移植后早期存活的影响缺乏兄弟供体的急性髓性白血病

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the only potentially curative therapy for acute myeloid leukemia. In the absence of an HLA-matched related or unrelated donor (MRD or MUD), the best alternative donor source remains controversial. Umbilical cord blood and haploidentical donors offer a shorter delay from indication to transplantation. This retrospective multicentre study of a French registry compares overall survival in the 18 months following registration in the absence of a MRD between four types of donors. Between 2012 and 2016, 1302 patients were transplanted using MUD (control, n = 803), mismatched MUD (n = 219), umbilical cord blood (n = 153) and haploidentical (n = 127) donors. Multivariate analyses were conducted for overall survival after registration, after transplant, and transplant-related mortality. After adjustment for variables, the type of donor did not influence any of the three end points. Our results confirmed the significant negative impact of longer time between registration and transplant: HR = 1.04 [1.02-1.06] (p < 0.0001). This indicates a positive correlation between better survival and shorter registration-to-transplantation wait time. In the absence of a sibling donor, the alternative stem cell source does not impact early survival in acute myeloid leukemia patients. The minimization of registration-to-transplantation time should be considered when weighing the alternative donor options.
机译:同种异体造血干细胞移植是急性髓性白血病的唯一潜在的治疗方法。在没有HLA匹配的相关或无关的捐助者(MRD或MUD)的情况下,最好的替代捐助者来源仍然存在争议。脐带血和寄箱血液捐赠者从指示进行移植的延迟较短。这种法国登记处的回顾性多期形研究比较了在缺乏四种捐助者之间登记后的18个月内的整体生存。 2012年和2016年间,使用泥浆(对照,N = 803),不匹配的泥浆(n = 219),脐带血(n = 153)和haploidentical(n = 127)供体移植1302名患者。在注册后的整体存活,移植和移植相关死亡率后进行多变量分析。在调整变量后,捐赠者的类型没有影响三个终点中的任何一个。我们的结果证实了登记和移植之间较长时间的显着负面影响:HR = 1.04 [1.02-1.06](P <0.0001)。这表明更好的生存与更短的登记到移植等待时间之间的正相关性。在没有兄弟供体的情况下,替代干细胞源不会影响急性髓性白血病患者的早期存活。在称重替代捐助方案时,应考虑最小化登记到移植时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号