首页> 外文期刊>Bone >Women with fracture, unidentified by FRAX, but identified by cortical porosity, have a set of characteristics that contribute to their increased fracture risk beyond high FRAX score and high cortical porosity
【24h】

Women with fracture, unidentified by FRAX, but identified by cortical porosity, have a set of characteristics that contribute to their increased fracture risk beyond high FRAX score and high cortical porosity

机译:骨折的妇女,不确定的是Frax,但通过皮质孔隙率鉴定,具有一系列的特征,这些特性有助于其提高骨折风险,超出高毛细得分和高皮质孔隙率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) is widely used to identify individuals at increased risk for fracture. However, cortical porosity is associated with risk for fracture independent of FRAX and is reported to improve the net reclassification of fracture cases. We wanted to test the hypothesis that women with fracture who are unidentified by high FRAX score, but identified by high cortical porosity, have a set of characteristics that contribute to their fracture risk beyond high FRAX score and high cortical porosity. We quantified FRAX score with femoral neck areal bone mineral density (FN aBMD), and femoral subtrochanteric architecture, in 211 postmenopausal women aged 54–94?years with non-vertebral fractures, and 232 fracture-free controls in Troms?, Norway, using StrAx software. Of 211 fracture cases, FRAX score?>?20% identified 53 women (sensitivity 25.1% and specificity 93.5%), while cortical porosity cut-off >?80th percentile identified 61 women (sensitivity 28.9% and specificity 87.9%). The 43 (20.4%) additional fracture cases identified by high cortical porosity alone, had lower FRAX score (12.3 vs. 26.2%) than those identified by FRAX alone, they were younger, had higher FN aBMD (806 vs. 738?mg/cm2), and fewer had a prior fracture (23.3 vs. 62.9%), allp?
机译:裂缝风险评估工具(Frax)广泛用于识别骨折风险增加的个体。然而,皮质孔隙率与骨折无关的风险相关,据报道,改善骨折病例的净重新分类。我们想测试骨折的骨折的假设,患者未识别出高脂评分,而是通过高皮质孔隙率鉴定,具有一系列特征,其有助于其骨折风险,超出高脂肪评分和高皮质孔隙率。我们量化股骨颈面积骨密度(FN ABMD)和股骨子系统妇女的量化骨折分数,在54-94岁以下,患者患有非椎骨骨折,TROMS的无椎骨骨折,挪威212例,使用三十字软件。 211例骨折病例,Frax得分?> 20%鉴定53名女性(敏感性25.1%和93.5%),而皮质孔隙率切断>?80百分位鉴定61名女性(敏感性28.9%,特异性87.9%)。单独的高皮质孔隙率鉴定的43(20.4%)额外的骨折病例,比单独的Frax鉴定的细胞评分(12.3与26.2%)较低,它们具有更高的Fn ABM(806对738?mg / CM2),较少的骨折(23.3对62.9%),allp?<?0.05。它们具有更高的皮质孔隙率(48.7 vs.2.1%),较薄的皮质(3.75与4.12毫米),低层皮质和总体积BMD(942与1053和586与699?Mg?HA / CM3),较大的髓质和总横截面积(245与190和669 vs.593?mm2),惯性横截面积较高(2619与2388?cm 4)allp?<?0.001。比较骨折病例和对照骨质孔隙率的控制时,皮质孔隙率较高,较低的皮质VBMD,较低的总VBMD,较小的皮质CSA /总CSA,较大的髓质CSA和总CSA总计比对照(ALLP?≤?0.05) 。因此,裂缝案例,不确定的骨折,但通过皮质孔隙率鉴定,具有较大的骨尺寸的积极影响的架构,该架构不会抵消较薄的孔隙率较薄的皮质的负面影响。皮质孔隙率的测量可以是捕获额外的断裂风险成分的其他特征的标记,而不是由Frax捕获的额外裂缝风险成分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号