...
首页> 外文期刊>Behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy >Is Cognitive Behavioural Therapy focusing on Depression and Anxiety Effective for People with Long-Term Physical Health Conditions? A Controlled Trial in the Context of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
【24h】

Is Cognitive Behavioural Therapy focusing on Depression and Anxiety Effective for People with Long-Term Physical Health Conditions? A Controlled Trial in the Context of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

机译:是认知行为治疗,重点关注抑郁和焦虑对具有长期身体健康状况的人有效吗? 在2型糖尿病的背景下进行对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: It is unclear as to the extent to which psychological interventions focusing specifically on depression and anxiety are helpful for people with physical health conditions, with respect to mood and condition management. Aims: To evaluate the effectiveness of a modified evidence-based psychological intervention focusing on depression and anxiety for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), compared with a control intervention. Method: Clients (n = 140) who experienced mild to moderate depression and/or anxiety and had a diagnosis of T2DM were allocated to either diabetes specific treatment condition (n = 52) or standard intervention (control condition, n = 63), which were run in parallel. Each condition received a group intervention offering evidence-based psychological interventions for people with depression and anxiety. Those running the diabetes specific treatment group received additional training and supervision on working with people with T2DM from a clinical health psychologist and a general practitioner. The diabetes specific treatment intervention helped patients to link mood with management of T2DM. Results: Both conditions demonstrated improvements in primary outcomes of mood and secondary outcome of adjustment [95% confidence interval (CI) between 0.25 and 5.06; p < 0.05 in all cases]. The diabetes specific treatment condition also demonstrated improvements in secondary outcomes of self-report management of T2DM for diet, checking blood and checking feet, compared with the control condition (95% CIs between 0.04 and 2.05; p < 0.05 in all cases) and in glycaemic control (95% CI: 0.67 to 8.22). The findings also suggested a non-significant reduction in NHS resources in the diabetes specific treatment condition. These changes appeared to be maintained in the diabetes specific treatment condition. Conclusions: It is concluded that a modified intervention, with input from specialist services, may offer additional benefits in terms of improved d
机译:背景:目前尚不清楚关注抑郁和焦虑的心理干预的程度对情绪和条件管理有助于物理健康状况的人。旨在评估重点的证据性心理干预的有效性,这些干预针对2型糖尿病(T2DM)的抑郁和焦虑,与控制干预相比。方法:将患有轻度至中等抑郁和/或焦虑的客户(n = 140)分配给糖尿病特异性治疗条件(n = 52)或标准干预(控制条件,n = 63)并行运行。每条条件都获得了对患有抑郁和焦虑的人提供了基于证据的心理干预措施。那些运行糖尿病特定的治疗组的人获得了额外的培训和监督,与临床健康心理学家和一般从业者的T2DM合作。糖尿病特异性治疗干预有助于患者将心情与T2DM的管理联系起来。结果:这两种情况都表现出了初步结果的改善和调节的次要结果[95%置信区间(CI)0.25和5.06之间;所有情况下P <0.05]。糖尿病特异性治疗条件还证明了T2DM的自我报告管理的二次结果的改进,与控制条件相比血糖控制(95%CI:0.67至8.22)。调查结果还表明糖尿病特异性治疗条件的NHS资源不显着降低。这些变化似乎保持在糖尿病特异性治疗状况中。结论:得出结论,从专业服务意外进行修改干预,可能会在改进的方面提供额外的福利

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号