...
首页> 外文期刊>Behavioural processes >Incentive salience attribution is not the sole determinant of suboptimal choice in rats: Conditioned inhibition matters
【24h】

Incentive salience attribution is not the sole determinant of suboptimal choice in rats: Conditioned inhibition matters

机译:激励肺化归因不是大鼠次优选择的唯一决定因素:条件抑制事项

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Highlights ? We studied rats preference for discriminative vs non-discriminative alternatives. ? Suboptimal behavior has been linked to the incentive salience of the discriminative stimuli. ? The only study demonstrating suboptimal choice in rats lacked a conditioned inhibitor. ? Our procedure involved both a conditioned inhibitor, and discriminative stimuli with incentive salience. ? Rats were optimal, suggesting that the conditioned inhibitor plays a crucial role in rats choice. Abstract Previous research has identified clear differences between pigeons and rats in the suboptimal choice procedure. Pigeons behave suboptimally, preferring an alternative with discriminative stimuli and a smaller probability of reinforcement, over another with a higher probability of reinforcement, but without discriminative stimuli. In contrast, rats behave optimally showing the opposite preference. It has been proposed that these dissimilarities are consequence of a higher sensitivity to conditioned inhibition in rats than in pigeons. Alternatively, recent research suggests that differences in optimality can be accounted for by a differential incentive salience of the stimuli employed as discriminative stimuli, and that both species are suboptimal when such stimuli have high incentive salience; specifically, rats were found to be suboptimal when levers were used as discriminative stimuli. However, in the evaluation of this hypothesis, a conditioned inhibitor was not employed. In the present report, eight rats were exposed to a choice procedure that integrated both variables discussed above: a conditioned inhibitor was associated with the discriminative alternative and the stimuli had high incentive salience. A clear preference for the optimal alternative was found, suggesting that the conditioned inhibitor had a considerable impact on rats’ preference, and that species-differences remain even in procedures in which the discriminative stimuli have incentive salience. ]]>
机译:强调 ?我们研究了对歧视性与非歧视性替代品的大鼠偏好。还次优行为与歧视刺激的激励显着性有关。还唯一的研究表明大鼠次优选择缺乏调理抑制剂。还我们的程序涉及调节抑制剂和鉴别刺激的鉴别刺激。还大鼠是最佳的,这表明条件抑制剂在大鼠选择中发挥至关重要的作用。摘要以前的研究已经确定了鸽子和大鼠在次优选择程序中的明显差异。鸽子表现出较差,偏好具有辨别刺激的替代方案和较小的增强概率,相对于较高的增强概率,但没有辨别刺激。相比之下,大鼠表现出最佳地显示相反的偏好。已经提出这些差异是对大鼠调节抑制的敏感性更高的敏感性而不是鸽子。或者,最近的研究表明,最佳差异的差异可以通过作为歧视性刺激的刺激的差异激励显着性来算作,并且在这种刺激具有高激励术时,这两个物种都是次优;具体而言,当使用杆用作辨别刺激时,发现大鼠是次优。然而,在评估这一假设中,不使用条件抑制剂。在本报告中,将8只大鼠暴露于整合上面讨论的两个变量的选择程序:条件抑制剂与歧视性替代方案有关,刺激具有高激励效力。发现对最佳替代方案的清晰偏好,表明调节抑制剂对大鼠偏好具有相当大的影响,并且甚至在歧视刺激具有激励促销的程序中仍然存在这种差异。 ]]>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号