首页> 外文期刊>Biotechnology Journal: Healthcare,Nutrition,Technology >Genome Editing with CRISPR-Cas9 in Lactobacillus plantarum Revealed That Editing Outcomes Can Vary Across Strains and Between Methods
【24h】

Genome Editing with CRISPR-Cas9 in Lactobacillus plantarum Revealed That Editing Outcomes Can Vary Across Strains and Between Methods

机译:基因组编辑用Crispr-Cas9在乳酸杆菌植物植物中揭示了编辑结果可以在菌株和方法之间变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Lactic-acid bacteria such as Lactobacillus plantarum are commonly used for fermenting foods and as probiotics, where increasingly sophisticated genome-editing tools are employed to elucidate and enhance these microbes' beneficial properties. The most advanced tools to date utilize an oligonucleotide or double-stranded DNA donor for recombineering and Cas9 for targeted DNA cleavage. As the associated methods are often developed in isolation for one strain, it remains unclear how different Cas9-based editing methods compare across strains. Here, this work directly compares two methods in different strains of L. plantarum: one utilizing a plasmid-encoded recombineering template and another utilizing an oligonucleotide donor and an inducible DNA recombinase. This comparison reveals one instance in which only the recombineering-template method generates desired edits and another instance in which only the oligo method generates desired edits. It is further found that both methods exhibit highly variable success editing the same site across multiple L. plantarum strains. Finally, failure modes are identified for the recombineering-template method, including a consistent genomic deletion and reversion of a point mutation in the recombineering template. This study therefore highlights surprising differences for Cas9-mediated genome editing between methods and related strains, arguing for the need for multiple, distinct methods when performing CRISPR-based editing in bacteria.
机译:乳酸细菌如乳酸杆菌酸菌通常用于发酵食品和益生菌,其中使用越来越复杂的基因组编辑工具来阐明和增强这些微生物的有益特性。迄今为止最先进的工具利用寡核苷酸或双链DNA供体进行重组和Cas9,用于靶向DNA裂解。随着相关方法通常以分离为一个菌株而开发,尚不清楚基于CAS9的编辑方法在菌株中比较。这里,这项工作直接比较了L.Plantarum不同菌株中的两种方法:一种利用质粒编码的重组模板,另一个利用寡核苷酸供体和诱导的DNA重组酶。此比较揭示了一个实例,其中仅重新组合化模板方法生成所需的编辑和另一个实例,其中仅寡端方法生成所需的编辑。进一步发现,两种方法表现出高度可变的成功,在多个L.Platarum菌株上表现出同一部位。最后,鉴定了重组模板方法的失效模式,包括一致的基因组缺失和重组模板中的点突变的逆转。因此,该研究突出了Cas9介导的方法和相关菌株之间的Cas9介导的基因组编辑的令人惊讶的差异,争论在进行基于Crack的编辑时需要多种不同的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号