首页> 外文期刊>BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology >Authors' reply: #BlueJC: BJOG and Katherine Twining Network collaborate to facilitate post-publication peer review and enhance research literacy via a Twitter journal club
【24h】

Authors' reply: #BlueJC: BJOG and Katherine Twining Network collaborate to facilitate post-publication peer review and enhance research literacy via a Twitter journal club

机译:作者的回复:#bluejc:Bjog和Katherine Twining网络协作,以方便发布后的同行评审,并通过Twitter Journal Club提升研究扫盲

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Sir,We thank Lewis and Rallon[1] for their letter on the Twitter journal club, #BlueJC. We are grateful for their comments regarding BJOG's efforts to encourage post-publication appraisal and engage with clinicians and trainees through an online journal club.We understand the concerns around the suitability of Twitter. Twitter was chosen as the social media platform of choice because of its large number of users and interactive nature. Twitter discussions are not restricted to certain networks, which encourages multidisciplinary interactions and has the potential for public engagement. During the demonstration at the recent Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists World Congress, novice Twitter users were able to participate in #BlueJC discussion using the hashtag correctly. However, we accept that the character limit can be challenging.
机译:先生,我们感谢Lewis和Rallon [1]在Twitter Journal Club,#BlueJc上的信。 我们感谢他们对Bjog努力鼓励出版后审判并通过在线期刊俱乐部进行临床医生和学员的努力。我们了解Twitter的适用性的担忧。 由于其大量用户和交互性质,选择了Twitter作为选择的社交媒体平台。 Twitter讨论不限于某些网络,这鼓励多学科互动并具有公众参与的潜力。 在近期妇产科医生和妇科世界大会上的演示期间,新手推特用户能够正确地参与#BlueJC讨论。 但是,我们接受字符限制可能是具有挑战性的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号