首页> 外文期刊>BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology >Deep endometriosis transvaginal ultrasound in the workup of patients with signs and symptoms of endometriosis: a cost analysis
【24h】

Deep endometriosis transvaginal ultrasound in the workup of patients with signs and symptoms of endometriosis: a cost analysis

机译:深度子宫内膜异位症经阴道超声在患者患者的疗效和子宫内膜异位症的症状:成本分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective Deep endometriosis transvaginal ultrasound (DE TVS) is accurate in the detection of ovarian endometriosis and DE; however, realisation of its full potential and utilisation remains variable. As such, patients may require a two‐step surgical approach (diagnostic followed by therapeutic laparoscopy) or experience incomplete surgical treatment. Besides the clinical implications, the economic impact of a two‐step approach to diagnosis and treatment on the healthcare system is likely to be significant. We aim to compare the economic costs of two diagnostic models of care for patients with potential endometriosis. Design Cost analysis using Markov model with 12‐month time horizon comparing the economic costs of two diagnostic models. Setting The study used a hypothetical population of 1000 women visiting a public tertiary gynaecology clinic. Population Women with potential endometriosis. Estimates for endometriosis prevalence and severity were drawn from local Australian hospital data. Methods The conventional model (M1) includes the basic TVS and diagnostic laparoscopy. The novel model (M2) includes the DE TVS. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted to capture the uncertainty in the information used to populate the models. Main outcome measure Changes to government, health‐service and patient costs with the adoption of the DE TVS compared with standard diagnostic methods. Costs are given in Australian dollars (AU$) and also in pound sterling (£). Results The total annual cost of the novel model (M2) is AU$12,547,724.03 (£6,826,673.63), cheaper than the conventional model (M1), which cost AU$13,472,161.67 (£7,329,620.15). Conclusions For a population of 1000 women, the integration of the DE TVS may save healthcare costs of AU$924,437 (£502,946.17) annually. Tweetable abstract An endometriosis‐focused ultrasound may negate a two‐step surgery pathway, including diagnostic surgery, and save healthcare money.
机译:客观深度子宫内膜异位症经镜超声超声(DE TVS)在检测卵巢子宫内膜异位症和DE;但是,实现其全部潜力和利用率仍然是可变的。因此,患者可能需要两步手术方法(诊断后,治疗腹腔镜检查)或经历不完全的手术治疗。除了临床意义外,两步方法对医疗保健系统的诊断和治疗的经济影响可能是显着的。我们的目标是,对潜在子宫内膜异位症患者的两种诊断模型的经济成本进行比较。使用Markov模型的设计成本分析与12个月的时间范围相比,两种诊断模型的经济成本比较。设定研究使用了1000名妇女的假设人口访问公共第三节妇科诊所。人口患有潜在子宫内膜异位症。从当地澳大利亚医院数据吸引了对子宫内膜异位症患病率和严重程度的估计。方法传统模型(M1)包括基本电视和诊断腹腔镜检查。小说模型(M2)包括DE TVS。进行概率敏感性分析,以捕获用于填充模型的信息中的不确定性。与标准诊断方法相比,主要结果衡量政府,卫生服务和患者成本的变化。成本以澳元(AU $)给出,也以英镑(£)为单位。结果新型模型(M2)的年度成本总额为12,547,724.03美元(6,826,673.63),比传统型号(M1)便宜,费用为13,472,161.67美元(£7,329,620.15)。结论为1000名妇女的人口,DE TVS的整合可能每年节省924,437美元(502,946.17)的医疗保健费用。 Tweetable摘要聚焦的子宫内膜病变超声可以否定两步手术途径,包括诊断手术,并节省医疗保健金钱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号