...
首页> 外文期刊>BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology >Commentary on Should oral misoprostol be used to revent postpartum haemorrhage in home-birth settings n low-resource countries? A systematic review of the vidence
【24h】

Commentary on Should oral misoprostol be used to revent postpartum haemorrhage in home-birth settings n low-resource countries? A systematic review of the vidence

机译:对口服误解源的评论用于预防家庭出生环境中的产后出血N低资源国家? 系统审查证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Misoprostol is an exciting and fascinating drug, but never seems to be far from controversy. Maybe it is not. surprising given that it has the potential not only to cheaply prevent thousands of maternal deaths each year, but also provides a highly effective but clandestine method for induced abortion. Misoprostol lias therefore attracted passionate advocates and opponents in equal measure. In the last decade, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, WHO and Gynuily Health Projects have put enormous time, effort and money into sorting out the optimal role for misoprostol. And, as a result, following 20 years of politics, intrigue and largely uncoordinated research, a global consensus is finally emerging regarding the science (if not the politics) around this drug. Both WHO and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (F1GO) have recently-produced robust guidelines on misoprostol use, and there has been general acceptance of the appropriate dosages.
机译:Misoprostol是一种令人兴奋和迷人的药物,但似乎从未涉及争议。 也许它不是。 令人惊讶的是,鉴于它的潜在不仅可以廉价地防止每年数千次孕产妇死亡,而且还为诱导堕胎提供了高效但秘密的方法。 因此,Misoprostol Lias在同等措施中吸引了激情的倡导者和对手。 在过去的十年中,票据和梅琳达盖茨基金会,世卫组织和刚果卫生项目已经为米索前列醇的最佳作用进行了巨大的时间,努力和资金。 因此,由于在20年的政治,阴谋和大部分不协调的研究之后,全球共识终于出现了这种药物周围的科学(如果不是政治)。 妇科和妇科和妇产科(F1Go)的国际联合会最近产生了关于米索前列醇使用的强大指南,并且一般接受适当的剂量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号