...
首页> 外文期刊>BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology >Induction of labour using prostaglandin E 2 2 as an inpatient versus balloon catheter as an outpatient: a multicentre randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Induction of labour using prostaglandin E 2 2 as an inpatient versus balloon catheter as an outpatient: a multicentre randomised controlled trial

机译:使用前列腺素E 2 2作为住院病的促进劳动,作为门诊,作为门诊病人:多期式随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective To compare clinical outcomes following induction of labour (IOL) using a balloon catheter and going home, versus prostaglandin (PG) as an inpatient. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Eight Australian maternity hospitals. Population Women with uncomplicated term singleton pregnancies undergoing IOL for low‐risk indications including post‐term, advanced maternal age and ‘social’ reasons. Methods Between September 2015 and October 2018, 347 women were randomised to a balloon outpatient group and 348 to a PG inpatient group. The PG group received Dinoprostone, either 2?mg gel or 10?mg controlled‐release tape. The balloon group had a double‐balloon catheter inserted and went home. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was a composite neonatal measure comprising nursery admission, intubation/cardiac compressions, acidaemia, hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, seizure, infection, pulmonary hypertension, stillbirth or death. Clinical and process outcomes are reported. Results There were no statistically significant differences in the primary outcome comparing balloon with PG (18.6% versus 25.8%; relative risk?=?0.77, 95% CI 0.51–1.02; P ?=?0.070), cord arterial pH 7.10 (3.5% versus 9.2%; P ?=?0.072), nursery admissions (12.6% versus 15.5%; P ?=?0.379), neonatal antibiotic use (12.1% versus 17.6%; P ?=?0.103), or mode of birth. Nulliparous women in the balloon group had lower rates of the primary outcome (20.4% versus 31.0%; P ?=?0.032); Parous women were less likely to have an unassisted vaginal birth (77.6% versus 92.3%; P ?=?0.045). Conclusions Balloon catheters may be a superior method of cervical priming for nulliparous women, whereas this may not be the case for parous women. It is feasible that nulliparous women go home after commencing balloon catheter IOL, and the likelihood of adverse outcomes is low. Tweetable abstract Multicentre trial shows outpatient induction using balloon catheter is safe and feasible for nulliparous women.
机译:目的通过气球导管诱导劳动力(IOL)后的临床结果比较,与前列腺素(PG)作为住院病。设计随机对照试验。设置八家澳大利亚孕产医院。人口妇女有简单的单身孕妇妊娠,正在进行IOL的低风险指示,包括阶段,先进的孕产妇年龄和“社会的原因”。 2015年9月至2018年10月至2018年10月之间的方法,347名妇女随机随机分为气球门诊群,348名PG住院基团。 PG组接受Dinoprostore,2?Mg​​凝胶或10毫克控制释放带。气球组有一个双球囊导管插入并回家。主要结果测量主要结果是包含托儿所入院,插管/心脏按压,亚赤血症,缺氧缺血性脑病,癫痫发作,感染,肺动脉高压,死产或死亡的复合新生儿措施。据报道临床和过程结果。结果PG比较球囊没有统计学显着的差异(18.6%对25.8%;相对风险?=Δ= 0.77,95%CI 0.51-1.02; p?= 0.070),脐带节动脉pH 7.10( 3.5%对9.2%; p?= 0.072),苗圃入院(12.6%对15.5%; p?= 0.379),新生儿抗生素使用(12.1%与17.6%; p?= 0.103),或出生方式。气球组中的无烟妇女的主要结果率较低(20.4%对31.0%; p?= 0.032);寄生妇女不太可能有一个无统治的阴道出生(77.6%,而p?= 0.045)。结论球囊导管可以是尿道妇女的宫颈灌注的优越方法,而这可能不是寄生妇女的情况。在开始气球导管IOL之后,无烟的女性回家是可行的,不良结果的可能性很低。 Twelable Abstract Multicentre试验显示使用气球导管的门诊感应安全,可用于无流动性妇女。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号