首页> 外文期刊>Biological psychiatry >Interactions Among Working Memory, Reinforcement Learning, and Effort in Value-Based Choice: A New Paradigm and Selective Deficits in Schizophrenia
【24h】

Interactions Among Working Memory, Reinforcement Learning, and Effort in Value-Based Choice: A New Paradigm and Selective Deficits in Schizophrenia

机译:工作记忆,强化学习和基于价值选择的努力之间的互动:精神分裂症中的新范式和选择性缺陷

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Background When studying learning, researchers directly observe only the participants’ choices, which are often assumed to arise from a unitary learning process. However, a number of separable systems, such as working memory (WM) and reinforcement learning (RL), contribute simultaneously to human learning. Identifying each system’s contributions is essential for mapping the neural substrates contributing in parallel to behavior; computational modeling can help to design tasks that allow such a separable identification of processes and infer their contributions in individuals. Methods We present a new experimental protocol that separately identifies the contributions of RL and WM to learning, is sensitive to parametric variations in both, and allows us to investigate whether the processes interact. In?experiments 1 and 2, we tested this protocol with healthy young adults ( n ?= 29 and n ?= 52, respectively). In experiment 3, we used it to investigate learning deficits in medicated individuals with schizophrenia ( n ?= 49 patients, n ?= 32 control subjects). Results Experiments 1 and 2 established WM and RL contributions to learning, as evidenced by parametric modulations of choice by load and delay and reward history, respectively. They also showed interactions between WM and RL, where RL was enhanced under high WM load. Moreover, we observed a cost of mental effort when controlling for reinforcement history: participants preferred stimuli they encountered under low WM load. Experiment 3 revealed selective deficits in WM contributions and preserved RL value learning in individuals with schizophrenia compared with control subjects. Conclusions Computational approaches allow us to disentangle contributions of multiple systems to learning and, consequently, to further our understanding of psychiatric diseases. ]]>
机译:抽象背景在学习时,研究人员直接观察参与者的选择,这些选择通常被认为是从统一学习过程中出现的。然而,许多可分离的系统,例如工作存储器(WM)和增强学习(RL),同时贡献人类学习。识别每个系统的贡献对于映射与行为平行的神经基板来说是必不可少的;计算建模可以帮助设计允许这种可分离识别过程的任务,并推断出个人的贡献。方法我们提出了一种新的实验协议,即单独确定RL和WM对学习的贡献,对两者的参数变化敏感,并允许我们调查过程是否相互作用。在?实验1和2中,我们用健康的年轻成年人测试了该方案(分别为n?= 29和n?= 52)。在实验3中,我们使用它来调查精神分裂症的药物中的学习缺陷(N?= 49名患者,N?= 32患者)。结果实验1和2为学习建立了WM和RL贡献,分别由负载和延迟和奖励历史的选择参数调制所证明。它们还显示了WM和RL之间的相互作用,其中R1在高WM负载下提高。此外,我们在控制强化史时,观察到精神努力的成本:参与者在低WM负荷下遇到的优选刺激。实验3揭示了WM贡献中的选择性缺陷,并与对照对象相比,具有精神分裂症的个体的RL值学习。结论计算方法允许我们解开多种系统对学习的贡献,从而进一步了解精神病疾病的理解。 ]]>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号