首页> 外文期刊>Biological Conservation >Quantifying the contribution of conservation easements to large-landscape conservation
【24h】

Quantifying the contribution of conservation easements to large-landscape conservation

机译:量化保护速度对大景观保护的贡献

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Private lands are critical for conservation of ecosystem diversity and sustaining large-scale ecological processes. Increasingly, conservation easements (CE) are used as a tool to protect private land from future development; yet, few studies have examined whether contemporary patterns of CE effectively contribute to landscape scale biodiversity and ecosystem conservation goals. We analyzed the distribution of 1223 CE established between 1970 and 2016 in the High Divide, a region dominated by public lands and of national conservation importance in the Rocky Mountains of the United States, with respect to ecosystem representation and landscape connectivity, two common large-scale conservation goals. We found that CE were frequently located closer to water and to other land protected for biodiversity (e.g., GAP 1 and 2 status) than were private lands more generally. CE provided increased representation within the protected areas network for 10% of the ecosystems within the region, particularly for mesic and riparian areas. Despite the addition of CE to the protected areas network, we found insufficient representation for 43 out of 87 ecosystems ( 5% representation on land managed for biodiversity). Protection of priority ecosystems varied across CE and illustrated potential mismatches between regional and national scale conservation goals. Furthermore, while public lands contributed the most toward conserving important areas for connectivity, CE protected potential landscape connectivity only slightly more effectively than randomly allocated areas. CE provide important complements to public lands in terms of ecosystem diversity and landscape connectivity. However, conservation planners and land managers could increase conservation benefits from CE by prioritizing under-represented ecosystems and more explicitly targeting lands to maintain landscape permeability.
机译:私人土地对于保护生态系统多样性和维持大规模生态过程至关重要。越来越多地,保护地役权(CE)被用作保护私人土地的工具免于未来的发展;然而,很少有研究已经检查了CE的当代模式是否有效地促进景观规模生物多样性和生态系统保护目标。我们分析了1970年至2016年在高鸿沟之间建立的1223年CE的分布,该地区由公共土地和美国岩石山区的国家保护重要性,关于生态系统代表和景观连通性,两个共同规模保护目标。我们发现CE经常靠近水和保护用于生物多样性(例如,GAP 1和2个状态)的土地,而不是私人土地。 CE在该地区内部的10%生态系统中提供了增加的陈述,特别是对于浅缘和河岸地区的受保护区网络。尽管对受保护区的CE添加了CE,但我们发现87个生态系统中的43个不足表示(& 5%的土地上的生物多样性的土地)。优先生态系统的保护在CE上变化,并说明了区域和国家规模保护目标之间的潜在不匹配。此外,虽然公共土地贡献了节省了最重要的连接领域,但CE保护潜在的景观连通性比随机分配的区域略微有效。在生态系统多样性和景观连接方面,CE向公共土地提供重要补充。然而,保护计划和土地管理人员可以通过优先考虑非特征的生态系统,更明确地定位土地来维持景观渗透性,从CE增加保护。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号