首页> 外文期刊>Biological Conservation >Surplus killing by introduced predators in Australia - evidence for ineffective anti-predator adaptations in native prey species? [Review]
【24h】

Surplus killing by introduced predators in Australia - evidence for ineffective anti-predator adaptations in native prey species? [Review]

机译:澳大利亚引进的掠夺者仍然杀戮 - 原生猎物物种中无效抗捕食者适应的证据? [审查]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Australian examples of surplus killing by mammalian predators were collated. These included surplus killing of native mammals and birds by foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and stock, native mammals and native birds by dingoes (Canis lupus dingo). We found no examples of surplus killing by feral cats (Felis catus). Incidents collated include historical anecdotes of surplus killing by foxes as they colonised the Australian mainland, recent examples where foxes killed threatened native species at sites despite intensive management to exclude foxes, and recent examples of the killing of native species on formerly fox-free islands to which foxes gained entry. Episodes of surplus killings by foxes, other than predation on captive or closely confined animals, appeared different in kind and frequency to those documented for co-evolved predator-prey systems on the large continental landmasses. They did not appear to be uncommon events associated with synchronised births of prey species, unusual or extreme weather that disadvantaged prey species, or seasonal food caching by a predator. Rather, surplus killing events appeared to reflect ineffective anti-predator defences by prey species when encountering a novel and efficient predator to which they have had no evolutionary exposure. We suggest that surplus killing by foxes may have been a feature of, and major contributor to, the rapid mainland extinction or contraction in range of many native species in Australia. In contrast to foxes, examples of surplus killing by dingoes relate mostly to domestic stock (calves and sheep). The arrival of dingoes to the Australian continent preceded that of foxes by 3500-4000 years, but they appear not to have had the dire impact on native mammals that we attribute to foxes. This may be due to fundamental differences in hunting styles and prey size and to their sparse populations in pre-European Australia. Active persecution of non-commensal dingoes by Aborigines, the lack of free-water, and the absence of European rabbits (Oryetolagus cuniculus) as an alternative food supply would have limited their numbers and their impact on native mammals.
机译:澳大利亚哺乳动物捕食者剩余杀害的例子被整理。这些包括狐狸(狐狸狐狸)和股票,原生哺乳动物和本土鸟类的剩余杀害原生哺乳动物和鸟类(Canis Lupus dingo)。我们发现野生猫(Felis Catus)没有剩余杀戮的例子。收集的事件包括福克斯殖民的历史轶事,因为它们殖民地区的澳大利亚大陆,最近的例子,狐狸在遗址造成威胁的天然物种,尽管能够在狐狸中排除狐狸,以及最近杀死原生物种的杀戮原植物哪个狐狸获得了进入。除了俘虏或密集的动物的捕食之外,狐狸的剩余杀戮剧集摘要,实物和频率似乎与大型大陆陆地上的共同进化捕食者 - 猎物系统的频率不同。它们似乎并未罕见与同步的猎物诞生相关的事件,不利的或极端天气,弱势猎物物种或捕食者的季节性食物缓存。相反,剩余杀戮事件似乎在遇到没有进化暴露的新颖和有效的捕食者时反映了猎物物种的无效物种。我们建议狐狸剩余杀戮可能是澳大利亚许多本土物种的快速大陆灭绝或收缩的一个特征和主要贡献者。与狐狸相比,丁诺欧的盈余杀害的例子主要与家畜(小牛和羊)相关。 Dingoes到澳大利亚大陆的到达之前,狐狸的到达3500-4000年,但它们看起来不对我们归因于狐狸的原生哺乳动物。这可能是由于狩猎风格和猎物大小以及欧洲前澳大利亚前稀疏的群体差异。通过原住民的非共和丁诺斯的积极迫害,缺乏自由水,以及欧洲兔子(Oryetolagus cuniculus)作为替代食品供应将限制它们的数量及其对原生哺乳动物的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号