首页> 外文期刊>Biological Conservation >Comparing bird community responses to forest fragmentation in two lowland Central American reserves
【24h】

Comparing bird community responses to forest fragmentation in two lowland Central American reserves

机译:比较鸟群落反应在两家低地中美储备中的森林碎片

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Habitat loss and fragmentation reduce diversity of tropical bird communities, but the predictability of how communities in fragments disintegrate over time remains unclear. We compared bird community changes of two lowland forest reserves, La Selva Biological Station (LSBS), Costa Rica and Barro Colorado Island (BCI), Panama, both approximately the same size (1500ha) and at similar latitude (9-10N) in Central America. Both reserves are losing bird species despite LSBS's connection to an existing large park (incomplete isolation) and BCI's favorable location within a largely forested landscape. We examined characteristics of guilds and species lost from the sites to determine whether patterns were similar, and thus predictable. Some of the same guilds declined at both reserves, particularly insectivores and ground/understory nesters. At LSBS mixed-species flock participants, forest species, and burrow-nesters also declined or became extirpated disproportionately. At BCI edge species became extirpated. Body mass was a poor predictor of species and guild loss at both sites, except for carnivores at La Selva. Thus, fragmentation appears to influence some guilds more than others, but which species decline or disappear in tropical forest fragments is also influenced by site-specific factors, mostly yet to be determined. We need to understand such idiosyncratic effects of fragmentation better, rather than rely on one-size-fits-all management plans to conserve bird communities in tropical forest fragments.
机译:栖息地损失和碎片减少了热带鸟类社区的多样性,但是碎片中群落随时间崩溃的群体的可预测性仍然不明确。我们比较了两个低地森林储量的鸟类社区变迁,拉塞尔瓦生物站(LSB),哥斯达黎加和波罗罗多罗岛(BCI),巴拿马,大致相同的大小(1500ha)和中央类似的纬度(9-10n)美国。尽管LSBS与现有大型公园(不完整隔离)的连接和BCI在大幅森林景观中的有利位置,但这两个储备都是失去鸟类。我们检查了从站点迷失的公会和物种的特征,以确定模式是否相似,因此可预测。两个相同的公会在储备中都拒绝,特别是食虫和地面/林下居住者。在LSBS混合物种羊群参与者,森林物种和洞穴嵌入者也拒绝或被灭绝不成比例。在BCI Edge物种中被灭绝了。除了在La Selva的食肉动物外,体重是物种的预测因素和两个地点的损失。因此,碎片似乎比其他会员更多,但在热带森林片段中的衰退或消失的物种也受到特定于场地特定因素的影响,主要尚未确定。我们需要了解碎片的这种特质效果更好,而不是依靠单尺寸适合的所有管理计划,以保护热带森林碎片中的鸟群。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号