首页> 外文期刊>Biology of blood and marrow transplantation: journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation >Unmanipulated Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Achieved Outcomes Comparable With Matched Unrelated Donor Transplantation in Young Acquired Severe Aplastic Anemia
【24h】

Unmanipulated Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Achieved Outcomes Comparable With Matched Unrelated Donor Transplantation in Young Acquired Severe Aplastic Anemia

机译:None

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Salvage haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) is considered in patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) if a matched unrelated donor (MUD) is unavailable. However, studies on haplo- and MUD transplantation in SAA are lacking. The present study retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 89 young SAA patients who underwent unmanipulated alternative HSCT between September 2012 and September 2016 at our single center. Forty-one patients received haploidentical donors and forty-eight patients MUDs for HSCT. Most were heavily transfused and refractory to previous immunotherapy. The median durations for myeloid engraftment in the haplo- and MUD cohorts were 14 (range, 10 to 21) and 13 (range, 10 to 18) days, respectively. Compared with the MUD cohort, haplo-HSCT cohorts had an increased cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grades II to IV (43.9%?±?7.8% versus 12.5%?±?4.8%,P?=?.001) and grades III to IV (21.1%?±?6.7% versus 6.6%?±?3.7%,P?=?.045) and similar limited chronic GVHD (47.7%?±?8.5% versus 38.5%?±?7.3%,P?=?.129) and extensive chronic GVHD (12.1%?±?6.8% versus 9.1%?±?4.3%,P?=?.198). The median follow-up time of the surviving patients was 26 months (range, 6 to 45). No significant differences were observed between haplo-HSCT and MUD HSCT cohorts in 3-year overall survival (80.3%?±?5.1% versus 89.6%?±?7.0%,P?=?.210), disease-free survival (76.4%?±?5.1% versus 89.4%?±?7.7%,P?=?.127), and GVHD-free failure-free survival (79.0%?±?8.6% versus 71.6%?±?9.3%,P?=?.976). Thus, haplo-HSCT, as salvage therapy, achieved similar outcomes as MUD HSCT in young SAA patients, thereby rendering it as an effective and safe option for SAA.
机译:如果匹配的无关供体(泥浆)不可用,则考虑抢救血份造血干细胞移植(HAPLO-HSCT)。然而,缺乏关于SAA中的HAPLO和泥浆移植的研究。本研究回顾性地分析了2012年9月至2016年9月至2016年9月在我们的单一中心介绍了89名年轻SAA患者的结果。四十一名患者接受了HSCT的HAPLoIdentical捐赠者和48名患者泥浆。大多数人对以前的免疫疗法进行了严重的转发和难治性。粘膜和泥落队列中的粘液植入中的中值持续时间分别为14(范围,10至21)和13(范围,10至18个)天。与泥队队列相比,HAPLO-HSCT队列增加了急性移植物与宿主疾病(GVHD)II等级II至IV的累积发病率增加(43.9%?±7.8%与12.5%?±4.8%,P?= ?.001)和等级III级(21.1%?±±6.7%与6.6%?±3.7%,p?=β.045)和类似的有限慢性GVHD(47.7%?±8.5%与38.5%(47.7%) ±7.3%,p?=β.129)和广泛的慢性GVHD(12.1%?±6.8%与9.1%?±4.3%,p?=α.198)。存活患者的中位后续时间为26个月(范围,6至45次)。 Haplo-HSCT和泥浆HSCT队列在3年的总体存活中没有显着差异(80.3%?±±5.1%与89.6%?±7.0%,p?=β.210),无病生存(76.4 %?±5.1%与89.4%?±7.7%,p?=β1.127)和GVHD无失败的存活(79.0%?±8.6%与71.6%?±9.3%,p? =?976)。因此,作为抢救治疗的HAPLO-HSCT在年轻SAA患者中达到了与泥HSCT相似的结果,从而使其作为SAA的有效和安全的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号