BACKGROUND: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is effective in the diagnosis of bone tumors when combined with careful radiologic and clinical evaluation. However, cases where clinical or radiologic findings are atypical or unusual may lead to an erroneous diagnosis. CASE: A 19-year-old male presented with a pain in the left hip area that had been slowly progressive over a 10-month period. Clinical and radiologic findings suggested either giant cell tumor or chondroblastoma. The smeared aspiration specimen showed loosely cohesive, oval to round cells with moderate amounts of pale pink cytoplasm admixed with pinkish-blue, chondromyxoid material. The individual cells contained a single nucleus with evenly distributed, fine chromatin. A few osteoclastic giant cells were scattered in the smears. A cytologic diagnosis of myxoid lesion with a few giant cells, suspicious for chondromyxoid fibroma, was made. The diagnosis of chondrosarcoma was made by subsequent histologic examination. CONCLUSION: Absence of the usual clinicoradiologic features of chondrosarcoma combined with an unusual cytologic presentation in this case led to a misdiagnosis. In most centers, FNAC has achieved undisputed status as a diagnostic tool, and cytologic diagnosis often forms the basis of the therapeutic protocol. However, at some sites FNAC diagnosis is more problematic. Awareness of the limitations and pitfalls of FNAC is just as important as knowledge of the scope of FNAC in bone tumors. Tumors with chondromyxoid features provide particular difficulties.
展开▼
