首页> 外文期刊>Acta Biotechnologica >Biofiltration for the treatment of complex mixtures of VOC - Influence of the packing material
【24h】

Biofiltration for the treatment of complex mixtures of VOC - Influence of the packing material

机译:生物滤池处理VOC的复杂混合物-填料的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Currently air biofiltration is largely considered for the removal of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) from polluted airstreams. In order to select a suitable packing material for the treatment of VOC polluted air and better understand the influence of the packing material properties upon the removal efficiency, a mixture of eleven VOC was treated in two down-flow biofilter units packed with either peat or Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) and functioned under similar operating conditions for 92 days. Using the peat biofilter under steady-state conditions achieved a removal efficiency of 90% greater than the 80% achieved using the GAC filter. Moreover, in both cases, a stratification of the abatement along the column was observed but it differed according to the type of the packing material used. For the peat biofilter, elimination of oxygenated compounds occurred in the first 50 cm of the column, whereas aromatic and halogenated compounds were treated in the segments closer to the outlet. In contrast, with GAC, the removal of oxygenated and aromatic compounds took place along the height of the column. For the removal of microorganisms fixed on peat and activated carbon particles, the crushing with an ultar-turrax was the most efficient dispersing method, compared to agitation with a vortex and ultrasound. The counting of microorganisms using three culture media [Luria Bertoni (LB); Plate Count Agar (PCA); Tryptic Soy Agar, tenfold diluted (TSA 1/10)] demonstrated that the TSA 1/10 was likely most suitable for the recovery of the peat biofilter microflora (TSA 1/10: 5.6 x 10(9) CFU/g of dry peat, PCA: 1.5 x 10(9) CFU/g of dry peat, LB: 0.3 x 10(9) CFU/g of dry peat) probably due to the dominance of oligotrophic bacteria, whereas for the activated carbon biofilter there was no significant difference (PCA: 4.4 x 10(9); LB: 4.2 x 10(9); TSA 1/10: 4.5 x 10(9) CFU/g of dry activated carbon) between these media suggesting that oligotrophic and zymogeneous bacteria are likely in the same proportion.
机译:当前,空气生物过滤被广泛考虑用于从污染的气流中去除挥发性有机化合物(VOC)。为了选择合适的填料来处理VOC污染的空气并更好地了解填料特性对去除效率的影响,将11种VOC的混合物在两个装有泥炭或颗粒的下流式生物滤池中进行处理活性炭(GAC)在相似的操作条件下可工作92天。在稳态条件下使用泥炭生物滤池,其去除效率比使用GAC滤池达到的80%高90%。此外,在两种情况下,均观察到沿色谱柱的减排分层,但根据所用填充材料的类型而不同。对于泥炭生物滤池,在塔的前50 cm处消除了含氧化合物,而在靠近出口的段中处理了芳族和卤化化合物。相比之下,采用GAC可以沿色谱柱高度除去含氧化合物和芳族化合物。为了去除固定在泥炭和活性炭颗粒上的微生物,与涡旋和超声搅拌相比,用ultar-turrax破碎是最有效的分散方法。使用三种培养基[Luria Bertoni(LB);平板计数琼脂(PCA);十倍稀释的胰蛋白酶大豆琼脂(TSA 1/10)]表明,TSA 1/10最适合回收泥炭生物滤池菌群(TSA 1/10:5.6 x 10(9)CFU / g干泥炭,PCA:1.5 x 10(9)CFU / g干燥泥炭,LB:0.3 x 10(9)CFU / g干燥泥炭,这可能是由于贫营养细菌占优势,而活性炭生物滤池则没有显着影响这些培养基之间的差异(PCA:4.4 x 10(9); LB:4.2 x 10(9); TSA 1/10:4.5 x 10(9)CFU / g干活性炭)提示可能存在贫营养和同质细菌以相同的比例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号