...
首页> 外文期刊>ACM SIGPLAN Notices: A Monthly Publication of the Special Interest Group on Programming Languages >A situated evaluation of the Object Management Group's (OMG) Object Management Architecture (OMA)
【24h】

A situated evaluation of the Object Management Group's (OMG) Object Management Architecture (OMA)

机译:对对象管理组(OMG)的对象管理体系结构(OMA)进行的现场评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

It has been difficult to objectively assess the real value or maturity of the Object Management Group's Object Management Architecture (OMA). While experience reports have appeared in the literature, these have focused more on the functionality of the end-system than on systematically exploring the strengths and weaknesses of the OMA, and providing practical guidelines on the effective use of the OMA for specific software-engineering problems. In this paper we describe a case study in the use of the OMA to integrate legacy software components into a distributed object system. We assess the OMA in this problem context, and indicate strengths and weaknesses of the specification and current implementations. We extrapolate our experience to a broader class of component-based software systems, and recommend an architectural strategy for the effective use of the OMA to this class of systems.
机译:客观地评估对象管理组的对象管理体系结构(OMA)的真实价值或成熟度很困难。虽然经验报告已出现在文献中,但这些报告更多地侧重于最终系统的功能,而不是系统地探索OMA的优缺点,并提供了针对特定软件工程问题有效使用OMA的实用指南。 。在本文中,我们描述了使用OMA将遗留软件组件集成到分布式对象系统中的案例研究。我们在此问题上下文中评估OMA,并指出规范和当前实施的优缺点。我们将我们的经验推算到更广泛的基于组件的软件系统类别中,并为此类系统推荐一种有效使用OMA的体系结构策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号